I observe that what gets played out continuously on this forum, is a debate about the validity of various sources of information, various parties, personalities and agendas.
This is good and as it should be.
Yet we all have different standards of evidence, and what we consider sufficient to sway our minds one way or another. Some of us are convinced that all information, no matter how "out there" should be weighed evenly in ones mind.
But weighed against what?? What view of reality to you espouse? How does one measure the information that comes in every day against what one seems to KNOW intrinsically? Have some of us had experiences so extreme, so far past the bounds of what many humans would consider reality as to almost make these experiences inexpressible through words?
I think so. If thats the case you speak your truth simply, gently and purely. This is not a court, and you don't bring your experience here to be judged as factual or not. You are simply sharing with those who will listen.
Some people will not listen. Thus is life.
To expect the moderators, and Bill and Kerry to mediate this information with no personal preference, with no prejudice, and with no standards, is at best unrealistic and at worst is just not fair.
WE just ask that they endeavor to try.