Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyH
"some guy" sent it to you? Can't see any mention of this on the net, nothing to back it up, oct 7th and 14th came and went with similar warnings and no evidence whatsoever.
It's not worthy of putting in the forum imho if it's simply from "some guy".
|
I think you misunderstood dude. It's not 'some guy's' appraisal, some guy sent him the appraisal. It's just quotes from the media. Maybe 'some guy' got the article off the net somewhere, maybe 'some guy' put the already existing quotes together. It's not a prediction, it's a correlation of quotes of a similar nature in a short time span. That it came from 'some guy' has nothing to do with it's validity as information.
What gets me about this kind of stuff is, we're all tapped into this stuff, so we're all thinking planned collapse, planned nuke attack, pandemic etc. The thing is, whether bad **** is gonna happen isn't a matter of if, but when. Empires are crumbling, oil may be running out - or if you don't like that theory, perhaps the need to control energy is rising - more resource wars, more death and violence is coming, whether it's the conspiracy version or the damn more bad **** version. WWII came out of the same kinds of circumstances. If it didn't involve a false-flag thingo to get the show underway, that would be an historical exception. Either way, the quotes are all correct: bad stuff is coming; yes nukes are worse than 9/11 etc. - with the exception of that C-Pow business about the 21st, 22nd January - that's just plain strange.
Maybe it's one of Rumsfeld's 'known unknown's' where you know you don't know something, as opposed to an 'unknown unknown' where you don't know you don't know something. If we know the date, but we don't even know about it yet, it's a known unknown.
