About the different version of bibles, from king james to vaticanus. Here is a study about the subject. I am not endorsing any religion in particular. The text obviously comes from a muslim source, but regardless of the source, the study brings many evidences that any observer would see.
Some quotes: "The gospel truth is that we have no manuscript from the first century and those we do have from second century are very fragmentary and with a lot of variances than later manuscripts."
"The truth is that the differences in manuscripts are sometimes so gigantic and so successful tools on putting doubt into different Christian doctrines, that beyond any vagueness they testify to us about the corruption of the scriptures."
"One have to bear in mind that many manuscripts found in Dead Sea Scrolls are of the same family with Masoretic text, hence the Christian claim that Masoretic text is a medieval redaction done by the Jews to undermine Christian prophecies and doctrines contained within the Old Testament is a mere childish accusation. Therefore differences between Masoretic Text Manuscripts and Septuaginta Manuscripts are also without any doubt proof of the corruption of bible text as both families of manuscripts are at least of the same age."
The rest here:
http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/wp-co...d/they_say.pdf
After this reading, which version is "the true word of God"? At least, inner wisdom and Creation's presence in nature are not corruptible... Put the bible aside for a moment and take a look at nature, Creation speaks in it...
Namaste, Steven