Quote:
Originally Posted by Lochinvar
There are people on this site that are/were employed by the people that run the UK (and probably the US) to break the law for a living (most often to the detriment of the masses). I think you are living in a bubble of naivete.
|
I just won't stoop to their level.
Again no one answers the question on where do you draw the line.
Once you do what they do, what's the difference?
EDIT
Am I really so naive to believe that not all conspiracy theories are true?
Certainly all is not what it seems, I would agree.
But just WHAT is true and WHAT is disinfo?
Is it not possible that some of these whistleblower's are feeding disinfo?
At this time, we must all decide for ourselves, and not fall into the trap of group think.
If Ufology wants to be anything more than a fringe counter culture, then we should be embracing the real heroes.
Like Leslie Kean, James Fox, Bruce Maccabee, Robert Collins, etc.
When whatever is called the truth comes, wrapped in the tag of disclosure, many just won't believe for different reasons.
Some will say it does not go far enough(Ufo community fringe)
Joe Sixpack really does not care, and won't believe the proof that is offered, unless there is some type of demonstration.
So what is the incentive for the Govts to disclose?
Disclosure is lose-lose for those in charge.
Govts are not about truth, they are about control.
So why believe or trust anything with regards to disclosure from the govt?