Quote:
Originally Posted by Christo888
Well 'The Chosen' I might have to agree with you about that quote!
The above 'quote' I do not remember reading in the matrix material so first off is it a misquote to discredit the 'author' or is this what the author thinks? Because if so, then I would have a problem with his thinking about the law of attraction as being only 'like attracts like' and that a final incarnation probably likes the same sex. If that is what the author believes then now I really question all of his material. Sorry but to become gay to be in a final incarnation is extremely laughable  if the author wants to be gay then have at it… and ironically 'like repels like' in magnetism.  Also, I can tell the author really did not fully define all the arenas of the Law of Attraction as there are many attributes to the generalized term. 'Like attracts like' AND 'opposites also attract,' one just has to learn or understand what situation or circumstance they are currently in in order to 'see' the mechanics of the LOA play out. Male wants female, magnetic field North flows into magnetic field South, negative attracts positive, the darkness attracts the light... the entire universal structure of physicality depends on three things... positive, negative and ground, which are not part of ‘polarity.’
I am going to conclude that the above quote is false and is not from the ‘author’ of the matrix series. |
Felt there were definitely some "polarity addictions" being dramatized, as you point out. Also the constant reference to "sequentials" and "simultaneous" is an obvious polarity issue.
The TROM model of polarities, and its techniques can be helpful for those who wish to aggressively address fixed polarities. The author is Dennis Stephens. I use a more shotgun approach and my polarities, among other things, become unfixed or vanished as I come upon them at their source of inception.