Quote:
Originally Posted by alyscat
TBH, since the ones I see who mostly wear it, like Bushco and the politicos who seem to be more interested in raping the country than helping it, I'm not sure that wearing a flag pin has all that much meaning anymore. It's become a mockery in those instances.
alys
|
Were the 'Bushcos' not wearing it to assist in accepting the so-called 'Patriot Act' and to underpin the drums of the so-called 'war on terror'. Those are a done deal and now the agenda looks like the 'coup de gras' is the continued unwinding of the American Constitution.
Could the next step in boiling the proverbial frog, post 'harmonization' as per the SPP, be : 1) The creation of the NAU?
Or even worse 2) Create a civil war through the manufactured economic collapse, and break up the USA into several major regions one of which would be called 'AZATLAN'? (sp?) The latter would explain why Mexico a) went along with the torching of their labor via NAFTA, thereby forcing those workers to choose between starving and migrating. (Of course part of this plan would be to leave the borders open, as has been done
despite the 'bogey men' Muslims wanting to 'take away our Freedoms' and blow us up.
(i.e. Like the Bushcos have done,
curiously.) Would not option 2) require a
radical, genocidal, racist group, like say 'La Raza' to do some of the dirty 'terror' work? (ie. Upon which to pin the blame should they get caught? (As was done by Rockfoolers.) ie. The criminal equivalent of those corporations that took the blame when the '
Economic Hit-men were caught.
Would deemphasizing the
US
A not be part of that step?
Why would an American/Canadian/Mexican want to assist in that plan?