Quote:
Originally Posted by 1mack
Hey feeler, thanks for responding to my comment. Like I said before, I am open to many things, and perhaps there were no planes, but as of now,there is more evidence suggesting that the planes were real and that explosives were used to bring down the towers. Just wondering, do you believe that space beams brought the towers down or that explosives brought the tower down? Quite a lot of people who believe that there were no planes also believe that high energy space beams were used in the towers' destruction. I think it is obvious that there are a lot of disinfo people out there, but hopefully with good efforts and research we can become a part of the solution (figuring out what really happened) and not a part of the problem (blindly following what certain persons may say without investigation). It can be intimidating learning of or meeting people who have different "knowledge" of what did or didn't happen, but hopefully we can make it through.
|
If you go to Dr. Judy Woods' web site, you will find charts that reflect the magnetic shift at the times of the plane impacts and "collapses." Particle beam weapons could have been situated on the ground, inside nearby buildings, or on top of nearby buildings (therefore the term "space beam" might not be entirely accurate). Explosives were used to give the impression of a gravity collapse, but the primary method of destruction was the directed energy weapons that disintegrated the concrete and softened the steel.
Recent earthquakes in other parts of the world also raised attention to the HAARP technology that the government has developed. Frequent bridge collapses in recent years also increased speculation on the possible use of directed energy weapons. -feeler