Quote:
Originally Posted by dayzero
Why the certainty? Why indeed.
Most likely cointelpro, in fact a dead ringer for cointelpro.
Yeah......i said it baby! I said it.
Far more intelligent research [ongoing] by the brilliant analytical thinker Gerry Zeitlin on this absolutely
enormous topic at his Open Seti site HERE
I warn you, though, you'll need a few weeks/months to absorb.....
and hanging around on forums is never good for the concentration! lol... |
Thanks a lot for this site Dayzero. I am glad to discover it.
This is also my thought about Greer. He has encounter people from the "elite" after 2001; Clinton, Rockefeller, that himself mentioned in front of the camera. I am sure he has bothered much the ones who keeps UFOs information secret with his Discloser Conference in 2001. I heard a senator mentioning the word spread like a whisper to the senate and many were taking it seriously, not having a clue how to deal with it. I have much respect for what he did in 2001 and still respect him. But my perspective tells me to be cautious about it him now, not the same man...
When someone create that type of wave to the senate, you can be sure there will be action taken from the "elite" to disrupt the movement. Today, we see a very different man, that is what bothers me. And why he called one of his project "Orion project"? Why not "Earth project"? Why "Orion"? Knowing the Orion star system had a past history of Earth intervention and human manipulation from some whistleblowers. I am not saying it is absolute truth, I am saying it looks very suspicious, especially when you add to this the fact he claim all ETs are "positive". What's behind all this?
Namaste, Steven