Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post - The smoking gun NASA a Fraud Proof Of Life On Moon

taomation · 12-31-2009, 11:27 PM

I must agree with Ravens and Doves. I have also done a fair amount of film restoration and these could easily be dirt specs. If there were life on the moon (and I am not saying that there isn't) I doubt they would send up twenty ships up to do recon and if they did, they would probably hover for a while to check things out. The ships may be fast, but unless they are insect people there reaction time wouldn't be much different than ours.

But I also feel that the "smoking gun" that Ravens and Doves gives could easily be those man made laterns. I have never heard of or seen evidence of this type of craft.

The "smoking gun" is a ship for all to see or your own experience. Mexico has had much better evidence than either of these examples.

I am not trying to put anyone down, but we have to rise to a higher standard. Film is a deceptive medium and if it is a film or video medium the example must be obvious and be able to hold up under scientific scrutiny...

12-31-2009, 11:27 PM	#25
taomation Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 97	Re: The smoking gun NASA a Fraud Proof Of Life On Moon I must agree with Ravens and Doves. I have also done a fair amount of film restoration and these could easily be dirt specs. If there were life on the moon (and I am not saying that there isn't) I doubt they would send up twenty ships up to do recon and if they did, they would probably hover for a while to check things out. The ships may be fast, but unless they are insect people there reaction time wouldn't be much different than ours. But I also feel that the "smoking gun" that Ravens and Doves gives could easily be those man made laterns. I have never heard of or seen evidence of this type of craft. The "smoking gun" is a ship for all to see or your own experience. Mexico has had much better evidence than either of these examples. I am not trying to put anyone down, but we have to rise to a higher standard. Film is a deceptive medium and if it is a film or video medium the example must be obvious and be able to hold up under scientific scrutiny...