Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post - Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations

sjkted · 12-16-2009, 06:09 AM

FWIW, here's my $0.02.

Like most people here, I have seen all of the Camelot interviews and followed their work for the past few years. I agree with some of the above posts that at this point with what I have seen and experienced, the idea of having an identity "created" with friends and people to corroborate and a background created from thin air is completely plausible.

I've heard from some PA members that everyone is doing their part in a spiritual sense, including Deagle and Burisch, but my point is that we are coming to a turning point and we are in the middle of a war here. No, I'm not expecting that the NWO is going to bust down my door and blow up my house -- this here is a spiritual war. It's a war for hearts and minds and support and whether the world becomes a place of liberty and beauty or tyranny and death.

It is for this reason that we must hold whistleblowers and any leaders like Bill Ryan to the highest standards. I'm not suggesting they need to perfect or even right all of the time. I'm also not even suggesting that we censor anyone, even a person highly suspected of disinfo. I'm just saying that when they say something that is totally out there that they need to be called on it.

For example, if someone were a expert witness for a court, their credentials, work experience, CV, etc would be reviewed by both sides and if they said something that appeared to be without support, they would be thoroughly questioned by the opposing counsel.

If I were a scientist being interviewed on the MSM news and I was saying that they sky was falling and that we're all going to die a brutal death, I would be thoroughly questioned and the news station would interview other expert witnesses to corroborate my testimony. Considering all of the propaganda/disinfo created by the MSM, why should we accept an even lower standard? -- i.e. trust me, I'm an insider. Don't ask questions!

For me, Deagle makes the grade as far as his background is concerned. He has an MD and experience in black projects, but the real failure is when PC fails to question him on his statements. It's another failure when people take his information as being credible, just because it's being reported.

12-16-2009, 06:09 AM	#27
sjkted Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: LA County Posts: 361	Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations FWIW, here's my $0.02. Like most people here, I have seen all of the Camelot interviews and followed their work for the past few years. I agree with some of the above posts that at this point with what I have seen and experienced, the idea of having an identity "created" with friends and people to corroborate and a background created from thin air is completely plausible. I've heard from some PA members that everyone is doing their part in a spiritual sense, including Deagle and Burisch, but my point is that we are coming to a turning point and we are in the middle of a war here. No, I'm not expecting that the NWO is going to bust down my door and blow up my house -- this here is a spiritual war. It's a war for hearts and minds and support and whether the world becomes a place of liberty and beauty or tyranny and death. It is for this reason that we must hold whistleblowers and any leaders like Bill Ryan to the highest standards. I'm not suggesting they need to perfect or even right all of the time. I'm also not even suggesting that we censor anyone, even a person highly suspected of disinfo. I'm just saying that when they say something that is totally out there that they need to be called on it. For example, if someone were a expert witness for a court, their credentials, work experience, CV, etc would be reviewed by both sides and if they said something that appeared to be without support, they would be thoroughly questioned by the opposing counsel. If I were a scientist being interviewed on the MSM news and I was saying that they sky was falling and that we're all going to die a brutal death, I would be thoroughly questioned and the news station would interview other expert witnesses to corroborate my testimony. Considering all of the propaganda/disinfo created by the MSM, why should we accept an even lower standard? -- i.e. trust me, I'm an insider. Don't ask questions! For me, Deagle makes the grade as far as his background is concerned. He has an MD and experience in black projects, but the real failure is when PC fails to question him on his statements. It's another failure when people take his information as being credible, just because it's being reported.