[Lorien]

I agree Phtha.

I also have a few comments of my own.

1) If I am going to investigate someone, to validate what they are telling me whether it be their background, knowledge, experiences, income whatever, do I need their permission? Granted, yes I would need it to check their bank records, which begs the question did Cliff really verify this an base his beliefs on that? If so, how did he do so, or is this just an assumption on Bill's part, or just a misunderstanding.

2) I agree that if a whistleblower truly is putting themselves in danger, and providing information, then yes we should protect them. However we should never take what they say as truth without verifying it on a daily basis. Unfortunately what we are up against is far more nefarious than what any of us can imagine. They can truly create people with entire histories, including friends to corroborate those histories. Just because someone has a conversation with someone for 45 minutes, sharing similarities, does not make it fact.

3) My opinion on Dr Deagle, and this comes from my gut which is never wrong, is that he is full of it. I have watched all his interviews, and I just do not trust him. This is my opinion though, and it is my right to have it. As it is Bills right to have his, and Cliff's right to have his. Attacking each other because of differentiating beliefs about another person is just ridiculous, and does nothing for any of use.

And so I ask, can't we all just agree to disagree? It would be one thing if Cliff came here to bash Dr Deagle over and over again, but I have seen no such thing, an so does not deserve such negativity.