View Single Post
Old 11-25-2009, 05:25 PM   #40
Lionhawk
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sol, Terra 3, Florida, USA
Posts: 329
Default Re: Vortex, 19.47 theory/ Sacred Geometry

Now your on the wagon Dan. That was what I was saying. To be able to determine where of what direction we were coming from and where we were going. The up and down tracking and when it crosses the 19.47 factor is a two way correlation. Agreed! So far what I have found with my crude software is that we are in the proximity of the plane of 19.47 and that isn't exact as I said because of my cad issues and finding a map, that is 2D of the milky way and placing the triangles as an overlay. Establish that first then track the angle and the direction and see where all that intersects. And when. This is my hypotenuse. Oh, Brook's too! Sorry Brook. I'm just trying to prove out what you have questioned. But I keep doing this.

Hahahaha But I am not going to give up as I see a direct correlation also with the 90 degree phase shift that is also present as to what Dan has also pointed out.

#1 Find the right map and establish if the 19.47 comes into play in 2D
relative to our solar system.

#2 Track what direction we came from and where we are going to see if all this intersects. Also when if we get that far.

#3 Then apply the 90 degree phase shift because that is what that is even though it was presented as a linear angle. To which those properties haven't been established yet.

Something like that and feel free to add. We have to establish the first objective before we can add another objective, etc, but the goal is to establish the correlation and the relationship in terms of our present direction. I am out of my box here so any expert advice from others is most welcomed. I just haven't seen anything yet that I can use to determine the first objective. If we can't establish that then the rest of it is a mute point and a waste of time.

Plodding along..................

Last edited by Lionhawk; 11-25-2009 at 06:55 PM.
Lionhawk is offline   Reply With Quote