Re: Worst case scenario in the U.S. and elsewhere
Well, I can see your rationale, but I believe you are operating from the premise that the US government still has the best interests of the American people as their focus.
I don't make that assumption.
Also, deflating their way out of their debts, would be a defacto criminal act, and who will enter into long range business arrangements with them then?
The other couple of considerations that don't jibe, are how do you get around the fact that most manufacturing has been shipped offshore, and how long will it take to tool back up to a manufacturing based economy, which has been systematically changed out since perhaps the 50's, and what do you do to keep your people from revolting in the intervening period of time?
The people ruining the US are doing it on purpose, because your vision of your country was once true, and it was the one and only stumbling block to the PTB's long range plans. US could have stopped them cold, and they knew it. So through the purchase of one politician, corporate head, scientist, educator, medical researcher, banker, media mogul, etc, after another, little by little, they have check mated the US social, civil, legal, financial, economic, educational, corporate, agricultural, military structures, to where these facets of your country are no longer able to act independently for the good of "we the people".
The PTB plans can not go forward with an intact USA. So I think that is why we see all the various moves taking place right now to desperately destroy what's left of the US. They have to create a situation where a one world government and monetary/banking system is preferable to suffering through what would have to be done, on a personal sacrifice basis, in order to restore the US to it's former self sustainable greatness.
I actually believe that the way forward from this point in time and from this current reality, is to just abandon the PTB structures and NOT try to go back to former paradigms. I'd opt instead to create a new system which is not centralized the way the current system is. That system was evolved by the PTB because it's the only way to firm up control into a very few hands. Small communities, looking after all of their needs, supplemented by regional trade, but avoiding the impulse to return to the silly system of centralizing everything. Personal responsibility. Each individual responsible for their own survival, and helping one another out from the desire to do so, rather than because it's been planned in some board room.
At least this is how everything I'm seeing looks to me.
Last edited by Myplanet2; 06-10-2009 at 12:53 PM.
|