Quote:
Originally Posted by THEWATCHER
We freely speak of many things, as we expect all others here to speak freely
|
Well, thanks. To keep with the ET Disclosure standards i'm still feeling safer to be hiding.
I was sitting at fountain today watching the water parade and a thought occured to me in all its complexity, pertaining to the research programs you refer .
My family has some medical backgrounds , we have lots of friends involved in long term studies on human biology/pathology,
and the difference between mainstream research and programs you refer to is obvious.
Still, most of science oriented folks are rather reserved and hard working individuals who do not enjoy making big claims. I suppose that's the case of ultra top secret researchers as well.
I find a bit frustrating that there're so many exaggerrated statements posted on their behalf all over the net, describing fascinating projects and proposals that did not occur in reality, or have been experimented on scarcely in extreme conditions , observed under those rare conditions that can not stand common case classification.
I'd be extremely interested if you could bring one of those individuals here,
who'd be honest and kind enough to divide grain from husks,
and give things right measure . I do not expect any detail explanations could be invested to here yet there's a lot that could be improved in common folks understanding, if that's where your interests are placed.
It'd save folks time, fears and fascinations..
I suspect there are also those whome you call OPI who would wish to rectify undue claims made about them here and elsewhere ?
Now..calculate the difficulty in answer to question number one plus difficulty involved in answer number two and the probability of accuracy quotient between ETI and Military Scientists will shine through clearly ..
Can you improve anything in this sense..?
