is nuclear war really a plausible outcome
 

it is my understanding that certain ETs would intervene if we were on the verge of destroying the earth. i think the disclosure project witnesses have done a good job at warning us about even keeping ICBMs up and ready for launch, much less actually launching them. i could be wrong, but isn't nuclear war a near certainty that the earth will be destroyed. we have enough weapons to destroy the world multiple times over. you'd better believe that if we use only one of those weapons that other countries will use similar weapons on us. which will obviously lead to us using even more of these weapons, and so on and so forth. detonating just one nuclear weapon will almost certainly mean the end of civilization here on earth, as well as earth herself. with that said, is nuclear war really something that most people think will happen? what's everybody elses take on this?

Re: is nuclear war really a plausible outcome
 

What an excellent observation. I've had thoughts along these lines as well and wondered the same thing. We know from reports that ETs can shut down launch sites but I'm not sure about stopping any local hidden nukes that "may" already be placed in strategic locations.

Re: is nuclear war really a plausible outcome
 

> I'm not sure about stopping any local hidden nukes that "may" already
> be placed in strategic locations.

Yes they can do that, instantly, and with little effort.

Proof, regrettably, is not available :)

A..

Re: is nuclear war really a plausible outcome
 

This may be proof ..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeLI0AvCPG4


Peace
Iain :)