Puma Punku 17,000 years old - more complex than pyramids?
 

Found this video in youtube, stunning ruins what do you think?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMviviXAIVI

another link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=da2hR0GCzco

Re: Puma Punku 17,000 years old - more complex than pyramids?
 

Could Ic suggest a different way of thinking relative to seemingly unexplainable places such as this?
http://www.pacal.de/pumapunku_en.html
Certain problems arise with weight and cutting of the stones, and WHY these stones were cut and positioned that do not fit our current understandings, thus think outside of current.
If gravity is a consequence of certain electrical interactions and not a force, then gravity can be manipulated.
If materials /matter are all made from one common substance, then they too can be manipulated.
If there is one common source of all, then it too can be manipolated.

These global megalithic sites exist, but are swept under the carpet as alien or unexplainable.
Not in hobbit land they are not.
All matter is ONE, all is ONE, that one often is called the aether, space is a better word, and We are in space, We are a consequence of space, just locally rearranged to be whatever.
The devil will be in the detail, the crystaline detail of dolorite and granite, weight and hardness are nothing compared to space, it is a thousand more times heavier and harder than these, it just appears almost the opposite, thus we are fooled.
But that fooling is collective, it is taught and constantly reinforced as correct.
WHY build these sites globally?
Why the predominance of a cross formation at ninty degrees, and spirals?
Imagine the stones been temporarilly weight free, and as easy to cut as butter, by the same force that they are destined to interact with.
Space, the final frontier.
hobbit

Re: Puma Punku 17,000 years old - more complex than pyramids?
 

Thank you Hobbit, certainly food for thought...

Re: Puma Punku 17,000 years old - more complex than pyramids?
 

Puma Punku is a very cool place.

Built before white paint was cheap, and...

NOT built by three guys with hammers chisels and donkeys, oxen, llamas, whatever.

So it obviously requires either a new answer for
what we knew,
who we are,
or who we know.

Scientists... please step forward and s'plain it. :D

Fred