Conspiracy of the century? Hackers 'expose' climate change
 

Hi Everybody,

It's been a few days since the hacking of the computers at the University of East Anglia. From these computers were recovered unpublished information and a vast series of e-mail communications that a t the very least suggested that the whole Global Warming thing is a huge scam.

This subject has got to be so important in the world, costing so much money to keep the 'investigations' going and promisses to be so costly in world CO2 taxes, I'm really suprised how much little exposure the subject drew not only in the mainstream media but also in quite a few alternative media websites. Some alternative media websites are slighting the hackers because what they did was illegal.

Are political moves in combating what could be deemed as a false prophecy going to take center stage and stifle this scandal so it falls by the wayside or will someone as well as Alex Jones take this on board?

I hope that the websites and MSM don't miss the boat on this one.

Best regards,

Steve

Conspiracy of the century? Hackers 'expose' climate change
 

Re: Conspiracy of the century? Hackers 'expose' climate change
 

This is very cool, the person who hacked the Hadley Climate Research Unit (CRU) did the world a huge favor by exposing the real data behind all the global warming false alarms. here are two key documents that became public with the recent whistle blowing at CRU. The first document concerns the accuracy of the land based temperature measurements, which make up the core of the climate alarmists claims about warming. When we look at the CRU error budget and error margins we find a glimmer of reality setting in, in that there is no way to detect the claimed warming trend with the claimed accuracy.
The second document contains 155 graphs showing the raw global temperature measurements and ‘trends’ for every country from 1900 though today. It contains two version of the CRU ‘processing’ – one from 2005 and one from 2008. What is just amazing from this ‘raw’ data is the realization that many areas of the Earth are not showing a huge upswing in temperature. The raw data paints a completely different picture than the final ‘results’ we see in Al Gore’s charts.
see for yourself.
http://2012info.ca/downloads/hadcrut...ort_200503.pdf
http://2012info.ca/downloads/idl_cru...5_vs_2008b.pdf

Also there's a very good analysis of these documents at http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11420

Re: Conspiracy of the century? Hackers 'expose' climate change
 

This is potentially a huge story... will it be suppresed??

he emails hacked from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia look extremely damning. Andrew Bolt at the Herald Sun states that “ . . . the 1079 emails and 72 documents seem indeed evidence of a scandal involving most of the most prominent scientists pushing the man-made warming theory - a scandal that is one of the greatest in modern science.”

http://www.examiner.com/x-17018-Envi...ng-researchers

Congressional Republicans have started investigating climate scientists whose hacked emails suggest they tried to squelch dissenting views about global warming.

An aide to Rep. Darrell Issa (R., Calif.), the ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said investigators are studying the documents, which unknown hackers stole last week from the computer of a prominent British climate-research center.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1259...s_Most_Popular

viking

Re: Conspiracy of the century? Hackers 'expose' climate change
 

What is the global warming investors reaction to this? Did they lose confidence? How is the global warming market? I think this is where you should be looking to guess the outcome of this.

Re: Conspiracy of the century? Hackers 'expose' climate change
 

Re: Conspiracy of the century? Hackers 'expose' climate change
 

Even though it was Fox, it's nice to see some MSM covering this.

I love how when Howard Gould makes the analogy that it's similar to when 100 doctors are saying one thing, and 5 doctors are telling you something else, you go with what the masses are saying... Well, I for one say H**L no to that. We all know that doctors are controlled by the pharmaceutical companies and prescribe what they are told to prescribe, and I for one don't trust them as far as I can throw them.

The problem with most of the "models" that global warming is man made is based off of a few sets of data that have been falsified. The scientists who are dissenting against man made global warming are the ones that took the time to do their own measurements and find out the truth for themselves.

I like Chris Corner, he did a good job of being blunt and pointing out the facts.