Originally Posted by Chinacat (Post 3690)

Hello and thank you for the messages. Can you explain this statement?

The dire events of 20 June 2008


I am not sure what you are referencing.

Originally Posted by Merkhava (Post 4255)

The USA and Russia were at the brink of nuclear war on 20 June 2008.

http://www.stevequayle.com/News.aler...ussia.war.html

Originally Posted by Merkhava (Post 4571)

Agreed. There are particular details of that report that beg credibility. Those fringe details are not anything I would advocate or defend.

I think the important point should not be lost by all the clutter of disinformation and exaggerations, and that is this:

There was unusual activity on 20 June 2008 involving the nuclear forces of the USA and Russia.

The current breakdown in US-Russian relations and the overt display of Russian conventional military capbability in response to western expansion deep into the Russian spheres of influence is consistent with a major change of policy in Moscow to oppose the unipolar paradigm of the US being "the sole world super power."

The US has overplayed its hand and the Russians made it clear they have had enough.

The rise of the Shanghai Cooperation Council as an eastern alliance to counter balance the West is altering the geopolitical lanscape and making old assumptions irrelevant.

Russia and China have reminded the US they possess nuclear weapons and that they will not standby idly if the US attacks Iran.

Originally Posted by Merkhava (Post 4648)

The cancellation of 2008 Presidential Election

Never since the crisis of the American Civil War has the potential existed for the unprecedented cancellation of the Presidential election in the USA. There are a number of reasons for this:

1) The threat of a WMD attack to influence the outcome of an election is ever present. It happened in Madrid, Spain just prior to the Spanish election, resulting in the removal of a strong supporter of the Bush Administration. Soon afterwards, all Spanish troops in Iraq were withdrawn. It is very conceivable, in the event of another 911 type of attack prior to the US election, that Bush/Cheney would implement the COG, indefinitely “postpone” the election and suspend the Congress and US Supreme Court from convening out of concern “for the individual safety” of members of the Legislative and Judicial branches of government.


2) Members of the 911 Congressional Commission charge that little has been done since 2001 to protect the nation against a WMD attack involving nuclear, chemical or biological weapons.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080909/...tdIRkV9NkazJV4

"The threat of a new, major terrorist attack on the United States is still very real," says the report to be released Wednesday, the same day a congressional commission will hold a hearing in New York on nuclear and biological terrorism threats.

"A nuclear, chemical or biological weapon in the hands of terrorists remains the single greatest threat to our nation," the report said. "While progress has been made in securing these weapons and materials, we are still dangerously vulnerable."

Congressional Democrats, meanwhile, had harsher criticism of the Bush administration's efforts. Their report, written by the staffs of the House Homeland Security and Foreign Affairs committees, found little or no progress across the board on national security initiatives.

"The Bush administration has not delivered on a myriad of critical homeland and national security mandates," said the Democrats' report that was released Tuesday.

"The administration has just failed to act in so many ways," said Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss. "Let's say that we've been fortunate that we have not been attacked" since 2001, said Thompson, who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee.


3) There is a tenacious impeachment movement in the US that is growing in grassroots support. This movement places many powerful individuals in the Bush Administration in personal jeopardy of not only being removed from office, but also being subjected to criminal prosecutions.

http://www.pubrecord.org/politics/31...inst-bush.html

Kucinich has collected 150,000 signatures, 100,000 of which have already been filed. On Wednesday, the day before 9/11, about 50,000 additional signatures will be filed with the Speaker through the Clerk of the House. Kucinich's office said the effort is ongoing.

Wednesday's news conference is entitled “The day before the world changed, a day to change the world!” It will focus on Kucinich's ongoing efforts to hold impeachment hearings against Bush.


4) Statements have been made by the Democratic Presidential candidates that investigations could happen to investigate potential capital crimes committed by Bush Administration officials while in office.

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...-13967420.html

Democratic vice-presidential nominee Joe Biden has said that that he and running mate Barack Obama could pursue criminal charges against the Bush administration if elected to the White House this November.

Biden said that an Obama-led government would go through Bush administration data with “a fine-toothed comb” and pursue charges if necessary.

-------------------------------------------------------

The motivations now exist to influence the Bush Administration to seek cancellation of the 2008 Presidential election in order to shield themselves from war crime prosecutions, remain indefinitely in office and continue their “War on Terror” global agenda. What is missing is the overwhelming justification to the American people.

If there is a WMD attack on one or several American cities, the pretext will exist to declare martial law and establish a de facto Bush/Cheney executive dictatorship.