Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE)

Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) (http://projectavalon.net/forum/index.php)
-   Project Avalon General Discussion (http://projectavalon.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations (http://projectavalon.net/forum/showthread.php?t=18277)

Sarahmay 12-31-2009 06:10 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
What I saw was this: Bill sent Francie a private email and asked her not to post the content...she did anyway, to make her point. I would expect to be banned for this. It is his forum, and he shouldn't have to deal with that.

sjkted 12-31-2009 06:22 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarahmay (Post 213598)
What I saw was this: Bill sent Francie a private email and asked her not to post the content...she did anyway, to make her point. I would expect to be banned for this. It is his forum, and he shouldn't have to deal with that.

How about this? If Bill and Kerry want the support of truth seekers, they shouldn't censor the whistleblowers.

--sjkted

sjkted 12-31-2009 06:36 PM

Some Things Don't Go Away
 
http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/0...melot-exposed/

I know Bill has semi-responded to this with his letter to Jeff Rense, but consider this issue of how Bill Ryan is not responding to Cliff's accusation and continues to give praise to how wonderful Deagle is in his latest "interview".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ic70cVN5IdQ

Listen to Bill's description of whistleblower testimony. He's not discerning and searching for the truth -- he's just weaving together a bunch of stories into a semi-coherent picture with an installed viewpoint. This is beginning to look no different than how the bible was created.

Folks, there is something VERY wrong here and I think we may be getting a little closer to it here.

--sjkted

YinYangMind 12-31-2009 07:04 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carol (Post 213483)
I appreciate your post on this Dood. What saddens me greatly is also looking at other long-time members who were recently banned, francie is just one of several. Whatever happened to the concept of a time-out? These were valuable members who have contributed a lot since the forum came into existence and it just is heart-breaking to see a pattern of complete censorship for these long-time contributing members going on in this forum. Were these permanent bans approved of by Kerry or Bill ~ which had done in the past?

Carol, I agree with your observation. It's seems to be developing into a difficult situation where niether the mod's or Bill & Kerry appear interested in getting to the truth especially since there has been a deafening silience from B&K with only the mod's stating policy and protocol with little convincing substance. I keep coming back to see where the discussion is headed hopeful that Bill will respond/reply...to no avail. I too am getting tired of the obfuscation and may just not bother any further.

BTW, got your message on my profile, thanks! I've tried to find a way to respond/reply even leaving a message on yours but can't find anyway to do so. I did visit your web site and signed up for your email subscription (KnowledgeTreks.com).

All the best & Happy New Year!

YinYangMind

cantaloupe 12-31-2009 07:19 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
I have always followed francie's posts, and have come away with the impression that she cares about the truth. I have noted and shared a certain disillusionment with what's happening at PC and think that that is a healthy thing when we are aware that so much disinfo is floating around out there or coming directly at us. Clark's right, Bill didn't answer the substance of Cliff's criticism.
I think that if one agrees to keep something private, they should do so.
If no such agreement is made, no one is bound to do anything.
I think the mods should reconsider their decision.
This site will be poorer without franciejones and others like her.
Happy New Year to All
Cantaloupe

sjkted 12-31-2009 08:29 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Camelot is an interface to something higher like any organization. For example, a person joins a church as an interface to connecting with God. The news stations are purported to be an interface to the reality of what's happening here.

Most of us are here for both of these reasons. We want to know our purpose in the world and who we are and to connect with the divine. Many of us have been disillusioned by religion due to the large amount of lies and the divisive nature of religion. Any semi-intelligent person has already discovered that if you're looking for the real story, the mainstream media is the last place to look.

There is a timing issue here. An outside force is on the march to implement world government. There are many reasons why they want and need to do this. One main reason is that our entire world system from the economy to the environment to food production is completely unsustainable. All of these systems are coming down. We all know this. In order for the outside force to maintain its power, it must control each step of the destruction followed by each step of the rebuilding. Most of us know where world government is leading us. It's not pretty. There are no more classes of people who will benefit from it other than the few families at the top. For everyone else, it will be nothing but the destruction of beauty and the emergence of a new dark age.

The people here are international, intelligent, and spiritually developed. If there's any real opposition to TPTB and world government, it's us right here folks. We're the real threat to them. They know how to handle armed rebellion and major conflicts, but they know there is no countermeasure to a large number of awake people who have pledged change by the peaceful way of waking up the world.

Some people say us groundcrew people are about 1 in 100 in the developed world. If this number is even remotely accurate, then there's way too many of us to kill, silence or otherwise thwart in such a short time and we are way too widespread geographically to deal with any way other than online.

So, what's left? Surely the outside force won't just let us be here and attempt to wake up the world. The only thing they can do is attempt to capture and misdirect our energy towards things that don't matter and are utterly pointless. If they were going to misdirect our attention, what would they do?

I have some ideas. All of them have to do with our distraction and demoralization:

1) Introduce information on scenarios that nobody can defend or protect against such as a pole shift. Nobody will survive this one. It's all hopeless. There's no need to wake anyone up since we're all going to die anyway.

2) Introduce information on an outside enemy of an ET nature. They can create stories that may leave people emotionally charged, especially for those who believe in religion. Instead of doing what we need to do, we fight amongst ourselves about who's really in charge and fall back on the irresponsible meme: I'm the victim. There's nothing I can do here, especially if these aliens engineered our species and they control our world with technology that's 5000 years ahead of anything we have here. Plus, this is a great introduction to the alien wars which is another rallying cry for world government.

3) Create drama. Much of it will eventually be resolved, but it's a good time waster and serious rifts can be developed with it.

4) Introduce fanciful stories that are seemingly connected, but have nothing to do with what is happening right NOW on our planet. Once again, it's fun like entertainment, but with all of the big problems on our planet, do we really have the time to pontificate on the details of life on mars?

5) Introduce people to some widely different views that are based on wild dreams and other "spiritual" experiences held only by the cult figure. The message here is that everything is ok, there's nothing to see and it's time to go home and just meditate and be blissful. But don't take action! The viewers who lack discernment will be fooled by these and accept them as truth.

6) Create stories to catch on people's fear of previous mass killing events such as the holocaust and the 1918 Spanish flu such as the new FEMA camps and the swine flu. The radicals among us will react by buying weapons and storing food. Fear will also cause confusion and inaction in many people.

As with anything introduced by the outside force, there's an element of truth to all of these. There could be an extinction level event. The ETs may be the outside force or they may not be it. Obama may have the best of intentions and in a spiritual sense everything is always ok. And there is a big issue with swine flu shots being given to the unknowing populace.

As they say in marketing, this is the "hook". This is what captures your attention and brings you back for more. It's the sizzle. The point is that these are all a distraction from the reality of what is happening NOW.

While many of us are spending time with #1 - #6 and arguing with each other over what we think is happening, our freedoms are being eroded, we are becoming poorer, and the very nature of commerce and government is changing faster than ever recorded in world history.

They don't have to stifle us forever. They just need long enough to put in a new government structure, some new control grids, and a further destruction of individual liberties. Once our reality merges with Orwell's 1984, we and our movement become irrelevant because there's nothing more that we can do. We need freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, the freedom to travel and communicate with each other in order to create something new. Without these things, we're finished.

In light of this, I ask you with Project Camelot, is there an unseen force that is using #1-#6 to thwart us? And why do Bill and Kerry, especially after posting their article on Scientology and the unseen force, not respond to us?

--sjkted

clarkkent 12-31-2009 08:45 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
well, i disagree...this is a handful of people who are attracted to this info, the PTB arent scared and theyre not threatened by some people into spiritual things and conspiracy theories.

this isnt a war, its the same bullsh*** thats been going on since the first tribe decided to start farming instead of hunter gathering. civiliaztion might be a bad mistake that gets repeated and fails over and over again for all we know.

bill and kerry are easliy duped by disinfo and then pump out alarmist gloom and doom that is just as orchestrated by the people everyone rails against.

the PTB arent scared of forum posters who buy books in the new age/ metaphysical section. (thats me too, im including myself) the conspiracy world is as infiltrated as any media/religious group is.

you know who the PTB are scared of? ghandi, john lennon, martin luthor king etc. people who preach undertanding and non complaince and do more than type on a forum.

it bothers me to see people here and kerry and bill get a huge inflated sense of how cutting edge/important they are. people make themselves out to be luke skywalker vs the empire. the real luke skywlakers are the indigenous people of the planet who didnt practice any kind of life similiar to the sick society we are in. they were not able to be controlled so they were killed off or assimilated into this collective insanity.

be a good person and try not to get manipulated, thats all you can do. if they can con you into fighting them and giving them energy or commiting violence against them then they do win.

when you realize that your 99% more manipulated than you think then your waking up (and that means all of us who think we know what reality really is and whats really going on because we browse a few sites or pick up a few books)



http://superstrangeland.blogspot.com/

sjkted 12-31-2009 09:15 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
the PTB arent scared and theyre not threatened by some people into spiritual things and conspiracy theories.


The PTB need people to believe lies and act on them. Anything that brings people together and towards the truth is a threat to them. If they weren't concerned about this, they wouldn't be spewing so much disinfo.


civiliaztion might be a bad mistake that gets repeated and fails over and over again for all we know.


On some level, I agree. It's hard to imagine it having turned out any other way. The point is unless there is some type of an ELE event, we have many options on how to rebuild civilization. Who knows, maybe we'll get it right this time? And even if we don't, there's many opportunities to resolve karma.

bill and kerry are easliy duped by disinfo and then pump out alarmist gloom and doom that is just as orchestrated by the people everyone rails against.


Agreed.

the PTB arent scared of forum posters who buy books in the new age/ metaphysical section. (thats me too, im including myself) the conspiracy world is as infiltrated as any media/religious group is.


Of course they aren't. We need to get past the new age/metaphysical section. The point is waking up (finding out the lies that we have been living and experiencing our whole lives) and then finding new solutions so we don't need to go this route again.


it bothers me to see people here and kerry and bill get a huge inflated sense of how cutting edge/important they are. people make themselves out to be luke skywalker vs the empire. the real luke skywlakers are the indigenous people of the planet who didnt practice any kind of life similiar to the sick society we are in. they were not able to be controlled so they were killed off or assimilated into this collective insanity.


I'm not trying to inflate my ego and I'm not saying that I'm cutting edge. My point is that we're in the middle of a real sh**storm and most people are just sitting back watching TV and drinking Starbucks. We are the ones living on this planet right now. If the groundcrew isn't the opposition to World Government and tyranny, then what is?

--sjkted

clarkkent 12-31-2009 09:29 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
well anytime therea real tyranny thats in any way physical, people do get off there keesters, if the gov tried anything really nuts trust me all the people eating nachos and watching everyone loves raymond would respond bigtime.

we have a few paths

-wipe ourselves out/biologcal instability/ georgraphical cataclysm ,humanity reset button
-figure out a way of balance with technology and get along with eachother ( like some ET's probably have)
-the PTB get their way and we end up like THX-1138 (if you dont know that check http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO99j...eature=related its like seeing where the illuminatti agenda would get us)


im not saying people shouldnt do research into all these matters and be awake, i just think its better to focus on getting along and not being manipulated through use of force, but so much is wrong and is ingrained into the way we live "materialism" and whatnot.

Seashore 12-31-2009 10:07 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sjkted (Post 213730)
My point is that we're in the middle of a real sh**storm and most people are just sitting back watching TV and drinking Starbucks. We are the ones living on this planet right now. If the groundcrew isn't the opposition to World Government and tyranny, then what is?

sjkted,

Your point is well taken by me.

I think members here have entrenched opinions and are not going to change them. In fact, pointing things out seems to make people dig in their heels.

But I hope guests of Avalon are paying attention to your well-thought out posts.

truth and integrity 01-01-2010 12:51 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally posted by tacodog
She did what she felt was necessary, in the process betrayed Bill's trust. That trust factor is between her and Bill. I disagree with the banning of FrancesJones. All the whistleblowers were entrusted with information, should they banned? What happened to the openness and integrity of this site?

I did not know that FrancieJones was banned and that her post was removed. It is getting more interesting. Members can not read her post to make up their mind where they stand on this issue. Secondly, FrancieJones can not speak for herself and explain her point of view. As I see it, Bill has started this conflict. FrancieJones asked Bill to remove her name from the Round Table. Bill responded to her request calling her hotheaded and impetuous. Had he removed her name, the problem would have been solved. Bill does not look as nice as he wants to portray himself.
I also ask myself the same question as you are” What happened to openness and integrity?”:shocked:

Best regards,

Carol 01-01-2010 03:09 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Actually... I've been thinking about our ground crew and something else which is pretty important when we look at the various projected data regarding solar flares.

I'll start a new thread and hope it becomes a sticky where we just do a solar watch and provide tips or links on how to survive a CME.

Meanwhile, I also will pray that some of these recent ban decisions are reconsidered and our long-term members are reinstated to posting status.

orthodoxymoron 01-01-2010 04:29 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Even the best people seem to get entangled with petty disputes...and I'm not just talking about Avalon and Camelot...or the substance of this thread. It's sort of like fiddling while Rome burns.

:mad3:Namaste:mad3:

Magamud 01-01-2010 05:48 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
In a severely corrupted world, in a house of mirrors organization is very difficult. I think sometimes that all we have is random chance and spontaneity.
By no accident our use of our mind and our communications has included malevolent intention. In a time of needed brainstorming conclusions can quite often leave no space for this. The flooding of benevolent teachers and word have been used up and no longer can one decipher fact from fiction. The slave masters know this and increase the flood of confusion. The attack is psychological, truth mixed with lies. Can we make it without relying on our state of communication?? Can we trust our telepathy and path of synchronicity to guide us...

sjkted 01-04-2010 07:34 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
I've posted an honest letter to Bill Ryan with my views on this topic. I'm not going to double-post, but I'll put a link to it here: http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/s...&postcount=579. I'm looking forward to hearing from Bill.

--sjkted

madgolem 01-06-2010 09:31 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sjkted (Post 215731)
I've posted an honest letter to Bill Ryan with my views on this topic. I'm not going to double-post, but I'll put a link to it here: http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/s...&postcount=579. I'm looking forward to hearing from Bill.

--sjkted

Bravo! :thumb_yello: I coundn't have put it any better. I really hope to hear from Bill on this one. I know Bill and Kerry have good intentions because they cut off dan burish and leo zagami upon finding out that they're disinfo agents. But there's still disinfo agent bill deagle and shills like miriam delicado spreading lies on PC.

swordsmith 01-06-2010 10:32 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
something stinks in project camembert, and it ain't francie jones.

Shame Kerry isn't more involved here or better still , could put Bill on a leash, but we all must move on in life and when there is this much tolerated (never mind defended) HYPOCRISY in a place supposedly devoted to truth, well , what a ***king joke, and I am tired of the swear ban, how old are we here?

People, seriously consider what forums actually are for. They exist mainly to mine information and manipulate the gullible. Sad, because the gullible so often come from the heart ,too.
For example, if you doubt that forums are for these purposes, then go to GLP ( god like productions) and mention just the word "Tavistock" , why? because that is the name of the social research ( engineering) group mining data there,( amongst others) It's an instant ban. People hate to be banned so they tow the line and give away a little of their integrity in increments, just to stay with their friends. Nobody is my friend here. the truth is my friend
yup, truth be told?... you wont find it here or maybe just the soft bits and the good stuff from people's hearts, but that is not what this place was set up for... in theory.
Besides, I just hate to see what happens when people become moderators, ego much? The third reich is quite easy to understand when you see what a little power does to people, god save me from the petty official.
Thanks to all the good ones who either stuck their necks out or tried to though.
Have fun in cloudy cuckoo land folks, it's getting pretty murky.

abraxasinas 01-06-2010 10:55 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by swordsmith (Post 217600)
something stinks in project camembert, and it ain't francie jones.

Shame Kerry isn't more involved here or better still , could put Bill on a leash, but we all must move on in life and when there is this much tolerated (never mind defended) HYPOCRISY in a place supposedly devoted to truth, well , what a ***king joke, and I am tired of the swear ban, how old are we here?

People, seriously consider what forums actually are for. They exist mainly to mine information and manipulate the gullible. Sad, because the gullible so often come from the heart ,too.
For example, if you doubt that forums are for these purposes, then go to GLP ( god like productions) and mention just the word "Tavistock" , why? because that is the name of the social research ( engineering) group mining data there,( amongst others) It's an instant ban. People hate to be banned so they tow the line and give away a little of their integrity in increments, just to stay with their friends. Nobody is my friend here. the truth is my friend
yup, truth be told?... you wont find it here or maybe just the soft bits and the good stuff from people's hearts, but that is not what this place was set up for... in theory.
Besides, I just hate to see what happens when people become moderators, ego much? The third reich is quite easy to understand when you see what a little power does to people, god save me from the petty official.
Thanks to all the good ones who either stuck their necks out or tried to though.
Have fun in cloudy cuckoo land folks, it's getting pretty murky.

There is much truth in the words of swordsmith and his disappointment in the general 'quality' of forums on the internet is well justified and easily validated by the impartial observer.

However, many 'oldtimers' here would remember the tediousness of writing letters, photocopying them and then sending them through the mail to their destinations. And this after consulting encylopedias or public libraries and books in timeconsuming efforts to 'share information' say without having access to publishers of the written or the spoken words.

There IS a 'Change of Guard' on the horizon and this change will require much effort of deconditioning mind manipulation (not all of a devious nature) of say a thousand generations (20x1000).

Of course there will be ego-issues of all: founders, contributors and moderators.

Allow me to say however, that despite some 'strange mod decisions'; the moderators here have exhibited spiritual maturity and a necessary selfdiscipline in most circumstances.

As swordsmith has said however; this 'banning business' should NOT be implemented as it is at the present state of the affairs.

In situations of dispute a poll asking all contributors about 'disputed behaviour' would represent a selfregulatory mechanism and clearly 'crystallize' via 'peer pressure' if a certain 'pattern' is acceptable to the majority or not.
The moderators, instead of banning, could call for the polls.

Abraxasinas

Olam 01-06-2010 11:05 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
This is my first post since the forum went free again. I originally was here in the first few days of this website.

It is quite different now than how it started.
You might wonder why am I saying all this.
Well its just so that you know where im coming from.

I do not want to get personal with anyone, or fan the flames, but I have to say this.

This thread is an amazing study on how things never change.
As far as I know, this website was supposed to be avantgarde and trailblazing, showing the way to a new kind of action, new kind of thinking and how we should act in a new society.
Sadly, its mostly ego based and "he said, she said" mentality.
Don't get me wrong, there are alot of great people here doing some great work, but when we strip away the articles,and info, we are left with people arguing based on the principle of opinion and free speech,"democracy".

All this is still inside the ego box. imagine all of us in a small community, faced with lets say a tsunami or great flood 3 hours away.....
Would the opinions change?....deep down, I think not. The percentage of survivors would be based on individual action for ones self.

Again, don,t get me wrong....this is how society is. This is how we learned to survive.......
I have been waiting here to see if it can be different and sofar, I think not.

Before anyone asks me why I don't contribute instead of bitching,....I still come here for the great info, but I can't stand loosing energy areguing with some of you. I did contribute in the last Avalon Epoch, I guess you could read that and see how I am.

Sometimes, we are too close to the trees and cannot perceive the forest.

Sorry if this is not clear, english in my second language.

sjkted 01-07-2010 02:26 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by madgolem (Post 217554)
Bravo! :thumb_yello: I coundn't have put it any better. I really hope to hear from Bill on this one. I know Bill and Kerry have good intentions because they cut off dan burish and leo zagami upon finding out that they're disinfo agents. But there's still disinfo agent bill deagle and shills like miriam delicado spreading lies on PC.

I was under the impression that Dan Burish dumped Bill and Kerry. Am I mistaken here?

--sjkted

sjkted 01-07-2010 02:34 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Olam (Post 217614)
This is my first post since the forum went free again. I originally was here in the first few days of this website.

It is quite different now than how it started.
You might wonder why am I saying all this.
Well its just so that you know where im coming from.

I do not want to get personal with anyone, or fan the flames, but I have to say this.

This thread is an amazing study on how things never change.
As far as I know, this website was supposed to be avantgarde and trailblazing, showing the way to a new kind of action, new kind of thinking and how we should act in a new society.
Sadly, its mostly ego based and "he said, she said" mentality.
Don't get me wrong, there are alot of great people here doing some great work, but when we strip away the articles,and info, we are left with people arguing based on the principle of opinion and free speech,"democracy".

All this is still inside the ego box. imagine all of us in a small community, faced with lets say a tsunami or great flood 3 hours away.....
Would the opinions change?....deep down, I think not. The percentage of survivors would be based on individual action for ones self.

Again, don,t get me wrong....this is how society is. This is how we learned to survive.......
I have been waiting here to see if it can be different and sofar, I think not.

Before anyone asks me why I don't contribute instead of bitching,....I still come here for the great info, but I can't stand loosing energy areguing with some of you. I did contribute in the last Avalon Epoch, I guess you could read that and see how I am.

Sometimes, we are too close to the trees and cannot perceive the forest.

Sorry if this is not clear, english in my second language.

I think the real problem is our mental conditioning. I agree with all of this and I don't think it is in our nature to act this way. I predict that even if we did get a chance to change things, the problem is that the seeds for the way to act and what is appropriate has already been planted in our minds. In other words, it would only be a matter of time before we collectively manifested the status quo that is this world again. And if we couldn't do it, then we would train our children well enough so that they could do it.

One positive thing I see with the economic meltdown is that it is a paradigm changer and because of it, people of all walks of life are going to be re-thinking all of their beliefs and axioms in life because they are no longer working. As their old beliefs are destroyed with the old systems, there will be an opportunity for them to adopt something new. The question is whether they will just look for another box in which to store their consciousness or if they will go down the longer route of expanding it.

--sjkted

mudhog92 01-07-2010 05:54 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Who here is infallable enough to judge another on their actions? Agree or disagree, need there be more?

We are all capable and reminded to make decisions for ourselves. Make our own decisons from our own experiences, not the experiences of others.


Why give someone enough power to make you angry?

If you care not for something someone says, give it no power. Keep the power for yourself.

One outburst does not make someone an idiot despite all the good work they have done already.

truth and integrity 01-07-2010 06:03 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sjkted
I was under the impression that Dan Burish dumped Bill and Kerry. Am I mistaken here?
No, you are not. Burish dumped them but Kerry and Bill tried to convince us that even though Burish was quite compartmentalized, he was telling the truth.:lmfao:

Best regards,

morguana 01-07-2010 06:05 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mudhog92 (Post 217824)
Who here is infallable enough to judge another on their actions? Agree or disagree, need there be more?

We are all capable and reminded to make decisions for ourselves. Make our own decisons from our own experiences, not the experiences of others.


Why give someone enough power to make you angry?

If you care not for something someone says, give it no power. Keep the power for yourself.

One outburst does not make someone an idiot despite all the good work they have done already.

Thank you for posting words of balance, something we could all learn from.
M x

TAXMASTER 01-07-2010 11:14 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
here is my take whether anyone cares or not. ( i am a tri-plegic and 1 handed typer so excuse mu punctuation)

i have followed for several years. i first came across burisch on earthfiles and was fascinated with all the detail and really wanted to believe. after he opened his own web site, i started to scrutinise his presentation. first let me say that i am a fairly intelligent person with a healthy vocabulary and i have met many people who are much more intelligent than i and most people that want to be understood usually talk at a level that can be understood by most people. burisch loves to dangle a vocabulary that most find difficult to understand which tells me that he wants to impress everyone on his intelligence. there was a video of him receiving mail that was supposed to be unknown by him so he could get his reaction and it all looked staged plus how could he not know about the secret camera? then there were pictures of him delivering food to the poor with notations by marcia about how much dan gives to the poor and homeless. again somebody wanted to impress us on how spectacular he was. then there are all these copies of articles of incorporation and other items on display that anyone can get by paying the fees and filing out some paperwork. another way to impress those that don't know any different. he is probably really intelligent but has the emotional makeup of a child and badly needs to impress us for his own self esteem. i do not see the government employing such a time bomb for sensitive work.

in listening to deagle, he appears to have a vulnerable and sincere tone in many of his interviews. i think bill is taken by his personality and feels protective of it in some way. my gut instinct is that he has mental problems and is delusional but because he seems very functional and has had tremendous credentials, and is a super intelligent being, PC takes him as the real deal. i think that he thinks he is telling the truth and because of his displays of tears in some interviews, Bill believes he is genuine and feels a need to protect him.

i never believed or trusted leo zagami. he seemed like he was high on something during his interview because he could not answer the question without getting off subject.

i am still on the fence about ben fulford but he always reports on these wild things that can never be substantiated. for now i listen and take with a grain of salt.

dr pete peterson reminded me of the first time i used a condom. my partner was well satisfied and i was loaded but couldn't fire any rounds. in other words, i went through the motion and got nothing at the end. as my dad told me once he went to an "all you can eat" restaurant for $5 and they brought out the first plate that he finished rather handily and asked for another. the waitress said it would be another $5 and my dad said the sign said "all you can eat" and the waitress replied "that's right sir, that was all you could eat"

michael st claire has a good vibe to him and i think he is one of the good guys.

i used to think david icke was a kook but have changed my mind. i like his message and i can buy into just about anything he says but i am on the fence with the whole reptillian bloodline thing.

i think that sometimes the people here are a little too judgemental of bill and kerry. they are not professional reporters but overall i think they get the message out that each person has to tell. the only critisism i have is that if you are playing reporter, you must be objective and not get personally or emotionally involved with the whistleblowers otherwise you ruin your credibilty as an "objective reporter".

I welcome responses.

Namaste'

Olam 01-08-2010 12:48 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mudhog92 (Post 217824)
Who here is infallable enough to judge another on their actions? Agree or disagree, need there be more?

We are all capable and reminded to make decisions for ourselves. Make our own decisons from our own experiences, not the experiences of others.


Why give someone enough power to make you angry?

If you care not for something someone says, give it no power. Keep the power for yourself.

One outburst does not make someone an idiot despite all the good work they have done already.

Yes, very wise words mudhog 92. It was inevitable that in my rant, talking about ego, well I used mine to write what I wrote. I am not mad though, rather sad at the current situation. I certainly don,t think of anyone as an idiot! that is still well within the box.
I still really think that humanity has a bad habit of not changeing anything unless we are up against the wall.
Thats it for me, I see the wall in the distance and wish very much we all push on the same side to stop it. Or if its unstoppable, how can we make the hit less violent psycologically as well as pysically.

I started the reply by saying that this thread is a reflection of who we are really, I do not judge anyone personally.We all have our strenghts, talents and weakneses.
That being said, I was well aware that my words would be taken in different ways by diffeent people, thats how we still live and have learned to live for thousands of years.
Well, its my personal thought that this type of life is about to end. We can choose to resort to being the Phoenix that rises from its very badly charred ashes, or we can choose to see the transition as giving birth. To me the 2 are very different and lead to almost the same place.

We are in the transition phase now and I feel we have no time for in the box disscussions and opinions on stuff that won't save your life(pysically and mentally) or your families life, or even your neighbors life....
Are my wishes just blowing against the wind?......I think not.
You are the society and the society is you. We rely on third parties to govern,regulate and ultimately control our life. Its been going on for thousands of years.
Its high time that we take individual responsability for ourselves first and include our immediate surroundings, or your local reality if you will.
If everyone understood that, I feel we would give birth to something grand and divine that has never been done before on this blue ball. Not only that but the end result will be a direct refection on how we got there.
To me that is much more desirable than violent crash and burn and then rise from that.
Namaste

Kulapops 01-08-2010 01:06 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
I'd like to say (ego!) that I was also here back along and I think looking back over the period that I have changed quite a lot.

I agree with the thought that perhaps the forum slipped below our initial high expectations of building new communities where people could perhaps learn to love and tolerate each other through the difficult times ahead. Perhaps it's just-another-forum after all.

But hang on... what I will say is that I have 'met' some great, inspirational characters here (and a couple in person) and they have helped me hold to my truth that we are right to believe in a better world. and many of those post reams of information and videos.

Once the initial scandalous attraction for information (and whistleblowers) regarding the immediate-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it subsided in me after the first ooh, say, year or so... I've since picked up much more practical info on topics like health and nutrition.

I don't really watch whistleblower vids any more...I've even stopped checking out the Camelot frontpage, because I don't see what use that information has in my life.

But the people, and the love, and the hope, and the desire for self-improvement is real. And Bill and Kerry did start the ball rolling on that by setting up this forum. So kudos to them for that.

This forum will bump along, but it's definitely moving in the right direction.

I now think that if we put our own life on hold to listen to what the next whistleblower reveals, or to debate their validity, we're just missing the point.

Say they announce there are ETs and we get a bonefide irrefutable witness. Say they land on the whitehouse lawn? What then?

We still need to eat, we still need to love, we still need to grow. It doesn't change a thing.

Peace n love,

K

Stargazer1965 01-08-2010 01:15 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kulapops (Post 218407)
I'd like to say (ego!) that I was also here back along and I think looking back over the period that I have changed quite a lot.

I agree with the thought that perhaps the forum slipped below our initial high expectations of building new communities where people could perhaps learn to love and tolerate each other through the difficult times ahead. Perhaps it's just-another-forum after all.

But hang on... what I will say is that I have 'met' some great, inspirational characters here (and a couple in person) and they have helped me hold to my truth that we are right to believe in a better world. and many of those post reams of information and videos.

Once the initial scandalous attraction for information (and whistleblowers) regarding the immediate-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it subsided in me after the first ooh, say, year or so... I've since picked up much more practical info on topics like health and nutrition.

I don't really watch whistleblower vids any more...I've even stopped checking out the Camelot frontpage, because I don't see what use that information has in my life.

But the people, and the love, and the hope, and the desire for self-improvement is real. And Bill and Kerry did start the ball rolling on that by setting up this forum. So kudos to them for that.

This forum will bump along, but it's definitely moving in the right direction.

I now think that if we put our own life on hold to listen to what the next whistleblower reveals, or to debate their validity, we're just missing the point.

Say they announce there are ETs and we get a bonefide irrefutable witness. Say they land on the whitehouse lawn? What then?

We still need to eat, we still need to love, we still need to grow. It doesn't change a thing.

Peace n love,

K

Great post KPops!!

I was just thinking the other day I don't hit the Camelot site anymore....

Panta rhei 01-08-2010 01:54 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by swordsmith (Post 217600)
something stinks in project camembert, and it ain't francie jones.

Shame Kerry isn't more involved here or better still , could put Bill on a leash, but we all must move on in life and when there is this much tolerated (never mind defended) HYPOCRISY in a place supposedly devoted to truth, well , what a ***king joke, and I am tired of the swear ban, how old are we here?

People, seriously consider what forums actually are for. They exist mainly to mine information and manipulate the gullible. Sad, because the gullible so often come from the heart ,too.
For example, if you doubt that forums are for these purposes, then go to GLP ( god like productions) and mention just the word "Tavistock" , why? because that is the name of the social research ( engineering) group mining data there,( amongst others) It's an instant ban. People hate to be banned so they tow the line and give away a little of their integrity in increments, just to stay with their friends. Nobody is my friend here. the truth is my friend
yup, truth be told?... you wont find it here or maybe just the soft bits and the good stuff from people's hearts, but that is not what this place was set up for... in theory.
Besides, I just hate to see what happens when people become moderators, ego much? The third reich is quite easy to understand when you see what a little power does to people, god save me from the petty official.
Thanks to all the good ones who either stuck their necks out or tried to though.
Have fun in cloudy cuckoo land folks, it's getting pretty murky.

I think there is some truth in this, there were many moments when I wished more discernment for PC as well, but discernment is not an easy thing. I think everyone can get lost in all those spectacular details someone like Dan Burisch is telling and lose the feeling for discernment, because the mind is so busy with trying to puzzle all those pieces together. That's the sad part because that's exactly what they want. To destract us and to stoke fears like Bill Deagle.

But on the other hand it's up to everyone to discern for ourselves. PC provides the info and a lot of it is of big value without any doubt and I'm very grateful for PC and what every person involved in this project does. So why not separate the wheat from the chaff for ourselves....

Carol 01-08-2010 03:19 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
There is a long list of those who dumped B&K. What one should ask is why.

puke 01-10-2010 07:24 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
An interface to something......yes
An interface to something "higher"...becomes a matter of definition.

I was surprized that Clif spent any energy at all making a reply on the forum.

I was almost equally surprized that Bill spent time on a reply to Clif.

We all have enough discretion not to need either one of those to tell us what we think of Deagle, Dan, or (insert name here). Although having another forum is a good place to glean info. and then discern.

Nuff said.

YinYangMind 01-12-2010 02:42 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
[SIZE="2"]Quote:
Originally Posted by petem
hi bill,
Your statements regarding Clif High hiring a "PI" to research Dr Bill has raised many an eyebrow among us Avalon veterans.


Thanks for this - this is one of a number of questions asked in this thread and on the one dedicated to discussing the issue.

The issue is sensitive, so I’ll just say this:

1) Kerry immediately invited Clif to her radio show so that he could discuss the issues with me and her. He declined.

2) My view remains firm that Clif High should not be investigating (and drawing conclusions from) Bill Deagle’s private finances with an intention to discredit him. And this IS his intention.

3) I was physically present in the room with Henry Deacon (Arthur Neumann) when he talked with Bill Deagle for 45 minutes in early December 2007, which included a fascinating exchange about classified projects, project locations, codewords and clearances. It was the first time they had spoken.

There was absolutely no doubt that the conversation was genuine and that Bill Deagle and Henry were both in the many places they stated they were. I'm personally convinced that (like Henry) Bill Deagle is well-intentioned, is a brave and principled man, and has told the truth as best as he knows it.

If Clif High has a different view, he has a right to that. But in my opinion Clif would be best advised to focus on his own prognostications and to respect data revealed by other whistleblowers without going out of his way to denigrate them publicly, digging up private financial information in order to try to do so.


Well, I'm not sure how the rest of those who have expressed interested in this topic will feel about Bill's response to this particular question from his thread, but for what it's worth, here's my observation...

1. Out of the several posts, comments, questions regarding Bill's initial pathetic response to Clif's open letter, Bill either has not seen the other posts/questions on his thread about it, or has completly ignored them and certainly hasn't seen the thread here...or maybe he has which may explain the response above.

2. Not sure when Kerry invited Clif on her radio show ('if' this is true, wouldn't it have made sense for Bill to make that known to those of us who have/were interested in seeing closure on this?) but Clif stated on his web site about two weeks ago that all interviews for January were canceled due to personal responsibilities which may explain why he declined...Clif is certainly not shy nor intimidated by Bill or Kerry and would, without a doubt, clearly articulate his position with which I'm sure Kerry would struggle with...wonder if Bill would have been on the show as well??? After all, it's Bill who has the issue here, not Kerry.

3. Is Bill suffering some memory loss? In his mini mea-culpa to Clif's open letter, he stated that he (Bill) was incorrect in stating that Clif had hired a PI to investigate Deagle and Clif clearly stated that he did not investigate Deagle's finances, yet Bill states in this response that Clif 'should not be investigating someones personal finances with the intention to discredit him...and that IS his intention!' Wow! Not only did Clif not do what Bill aledges, but makes another 'claim' of what Clif's intentions are without providing evidence or proof! Clif simply did what the rest of us have asked B&K to do with their 'whistleblowers'...

4. Here we go again...complete support without considering or addressing the well documented, public facts (some of which contain financial information without 'digging') of the many nefarious issues surrounding Deagle...there are none so blind as they who will not see!

5. Bill should take his own advice given to Clif in his last statement of the response...in fact, Clif does exactly what Bill suggests... 'focus on his own prognostications and to respect data revealed by other whistleblowers' and either supports quantifyable data (LaViolette, Geryl, etc.) or calls them out (Deagle, et al) when he finds supporting data/information/evidence...the only objective Clif ever expresses is facts and truth, not blind acceptance and loyalty.

This has pretty much sealed the loss of any trust and respect I've had for B&K, and I've promoted their work to many over the years. In fact, it has mostly been Bill who I thought had the best grasp and conduct throughout the interviews where Kerry just seemed to struggle, Bill picked up the pieces.

To all of the PA members who have taken the high road with 'can't we all get along, peace, love, brotherhood, personal space/place in time, spiritual growth in one's own time, higher this & that, back at ya and I wish you well. For me, the 'policitally correct, love your brother in spirit' perspective is just a little to wishy-washy when it comes to human discourse and interaction, in fact, the universe is both hard and soft in it's expression and manifestation and sometimes it takes you to the mat and it's time to get tough. I hope my statements and comments are taken for what they are...

'Always speak your mind and thoughts, those who matter won't mind and those who mind don't matter!'

Peace,
YinYangMind]

sjkted 01-12-2010 11:57 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
3. Is Bill suffering some memory loss? In his mini mea-culpa to Clif's open letter, he stated that he (Bill) was incorrect in stating that Clif had hired a PI to investigate Deagle and Clif clearly stated that he did not investigate Deagle's finances, yet Bill states in this response that Clif 'should not be investigating someones personal finances with the intention to discredit him...and that IS his intention!' Wow! Not only did Clif not do what Bill aledges, but makes another 'claim' of what Clif's intentions are without providing evidence or proof! Clif simply did what the rest of us have asked B&K to do with their 'whistleblowers'...

Strange indeed. I had to read the post a few times as I was trying to make sure I wasn't re-reading an old post. It's almost as if he forgot the last message and all of the fuss it generated.

--sjkted

Kulapops 01-13-2010 12:19 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Maybe there are two Bill's ?!!

Sheesh.. I'm only joking ! :original:

sjkted 01-13-2010 12:41 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
He obviously didn't read my letter to him Re: Bill Deagle. Per Bill Ryan's post today on Bill Deagle. He is still correlating information from the different sources...

Why anyone thinks he presents disinformation I genuinely don't understand. His information correlates strongly with ours (from totally separate sources).

YinYangMind 01-13-2010 05:57 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sjkted (Post 221557)
He obviously didn't read my letter to him Re: Bill Deagle. Per Bill Ryan's post today on Bill Deagle. He is still correlating information from the different sources...

Why anyone thinks he presents disinformation I genuinely don't understand. His information correlates strongly with ours (from totally separate sources).

Your message to Bill was articulate, to the point and more relevant than any others on this subject as well as many others! In fact, it may be filled with too much intelligence and specificity for him to handle based on the responses he's provided to other (less meaningful IMO) posts. It's really becoming too vacuous and diaphanous for my tastes.

If you haven't heard the Veritas Show with Mel Fabregas www.VeritasShow.com, I encourage you to visit and listen to the show highlights Mel provides. He not only has an excellent interview with Clif, but his interview with Bob Dean is far superior (again, IMO) than all the Dean interviews done by B&K. Mel has excellent interview skills and intellect that even his guests admire...which I think results in more quantifiable and quality information for the listener.

Got a good scratch going on with B&K/PC/PA as a result of the strange and nefarious goings on of late and how they are being/not being handled. I realize they are amatures at what they are doing which comes out quite regularly, but even amatures can do a great job when the key drivers are intent with integrity and the pursuit of facts and truth regardless of personal belief/agenda/system.

Mel's position/question as the focus of his show is, "Do you want to believe, or do you want to know?" I want both, but I must know before I can believe.

Something strange wrapped in change comes this way sooner than later. Separating the wheat from the chaff is more important now than ever. I've seen enough chaff around here and it's time to make some bread!

There's truth and then there's facts...everybody needs to pick one or the other and proceed with alacrity...time is short!

Peace,

YinYangMind

dolphin 01-13-2010 06:21 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
yingyang, you've put it in a nutshell. very well said. i've been here since pa started, and have "followed" their interviews and info all along, trusting their motives, until it started to get very weird, both b and k and their whistleblowers. i've lost all respect for bill on this one and when you listen to mel's show on veritas, well, there's no comparison who's the pro. mel is just the best out there.

bill just doesn't get it, and after reading his second response, well, amazingly he still doesn't get it... it's about integrity. their ship is sinking and the crew are abandoning ship.

Seashore 01-13-2010 10:51 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shiva777 (Post 200769)

(Quoting Clif High) I began my own research into Bill Deagle by the simple expedient of Google ... In the investigation that I did perform with Google, the second query that I used was “Dr + Bill + Deagle + fraud”. The results led me directly to the information that I passed on to Bill Ryan that he has misunderstood.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Ryan (Post 200860)

Clif was correct about my getting the 'PI' wrong. That was my error. The rest of what I wrote was essentially correct.

The substantive issue is that Clif was trying to smear a whistleblower for reasons best known to himself, and was searching for information he could use to discredit him. For me, that's an integrity issue.

What I'd called a PI [Private Investigator] was described in the original e-mail (sent to me on 14 April) by Clif as a "researcher/detective". This person was NOT hired by him. My mistake, and I'm happy to correct that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by YinYangMind (Post 221212)

3. Is Bill suffering some memory loss? In his mini mea-culpa to Clif's open letter, he stated that he (Bill) was incorrect in stating that Clif had hired a PI to investigate Deagle and Clif clearly stated that he did not investigate Deagle's finances, yet Bill states in this response that Clif 'should not be investigating someones personal finances with the intention to discredit him...and that IS his intention!' Wow! Not only did Clif not do what Bill aledges, but makes another 'claim' of what Clif's intentions are without providing evidence or proof! Clif simply did what the rest of us have asked B&K to do with their 'whistleblowers'...



Actually, what happened was that Clif High used information gained by someone who got access to Dr Deagle's personal bank account, which he found via a Google search, rather than by hiring a PI.

That's my understanding of the sequence of events.

sjkted 01-13-2010 10:55 PM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Ok. That would explain Bill Ryan's last response. Some things can get distorted with threads on the internet :-) Apparently, there aren't two of him.

--sjkted

YinYangMind 01-14-2010 02:55 AM

Re: Cliff High view on Bill Ryans accusations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Seashore (Post 222140)
Actually, what happened was that Clif High used information gained by someone who got access to Dr Deagle's personal bank account, which he found via a Google search, rather than by hiring a PI.

That's my understanding of the sequence of events.

Seashore, where did your 'understanding' come from? This information while interesting doesn't seem to add to the substance of the issue.

Highly curious considering the following:

Here's Bill's first 'public' response to the original question which prompted Clif's 'Open Letter':


“As best we understand, Clif High set a PI [Private Investigator] on Deagle's bank account without Deagle's knowledge or consent, with an instruction to look for something that could be used against him.

The PI found some income that he could not account for and Clif therefore assumed that he must be a paid agent.

It's an understatement to say that this is very dumb of Clif, who is normally a bright guy. If anyone looked in to my bank account, or yours, or anyone's, they would find things they didn't understand. I don't even understand my own bank statements sometimes."


His latest statement does not include the original information in his reply to Clif's letter on 12/15 about getting an email directly from Clif about the alledged PI/Financial information:

"What I'd called a PI [Private Investigator] was described in the original e-mail (sent to me on 14 April) by Clif as a "researcher/detective". This person was NOT hired by him. My mistake, and I'm happy to correct that."

Questions come to mind on this:

1. Bill states that the information came from an 'original e-mail from Clif on April 14' and now the issue surfaces 8 months later???

2. Bill only mentions this supposed e-mail once but never produces it as evidence of his (bill's) position...why?

3. Bill admits that his original claim of Clif hiring the PI to investigate Deagle's finances was incorrect, yet continues with the probing of Deagle's finances by Clif as an issue of integrity and slander on Clif's part...which is it Bill???

4. Who is this mystery person that dug up financial information on Deagle that was falsely attributed to Clif, is it true and relevant (regardless of consent)?

5. Clif's open letter states very clearly the significant problems he has with Deagle including supporting details as to why Deagle's inside information, experience, knowledge, observations & prognostications are questionable at best. Why doesn't Bill address these as he has had to do with Burish and the rest?

6. If Bill can't make sense out of his own bank account/statement, why should we trust his interpretation of esoteric, scientific, cosmic, conscious and spiritual matters?



Then, Bill's latest reply continues with:

- Clif's 'financial inquiry improprieties'

- maintains his position that Clif did something wrong,

- completly ignores the very detailed and articulate substantive issues Clif raises regarding Deagle's information which DO NOT INCLUDE FINANCES but specifically deal with the information B&K get from Deagle,

- ignores the multitude of posts from members here regarding their own issues/concerns about Deagle including detailed and informative posts/questions from myself and skjted,

- continues with his undaunting support of Deagle as a 'good man with a good heart' with a feel good story,

- then, arrogantly, suggests that Clif should 'focus on his own prognostications and to respect data revealed by other whistleblowers without going out of his way to denigrate them publicly,' the last part of which Camelot should be doing more of themselves which possibly could mitigate the strange and curious fueds, exits and excuses/ass coverings that B&K have been doing more of the last 6 months than anything else.

Gotta say, I've had enough of the obfuscation from Bill on this. Coupled with the disasters of Burish, Deagle, Deacon, Jane, et al, and the wealth of much better and professional investigative/whistleblowing/research/interviews that are available, it's time for this mind to move along and not waste precious focus and energy on what once was Camelot but now is sadly 'CameNot.'

You will know them by their words and judge them by their actions...

Peace,

YinYangMind


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Project Avalon