|
|
Project Avalon General Discussion Finding safe places, information and resources for building communities, site suggestions. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-11-2008, 10:34 PM | #51 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 289
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Actually I find it a little amusing how E=MC^2 mentioned a lot.
It is basically Newtons F=ma taken to the extreme if you look at it for a mo |
11-11-2008, 10:52 PM | #52 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 85
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Richard Hoagland and Mark Rodin video
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...l_Mathematics/ Have you heard of Cymatics? - Look into it, it may help with your research! |
11-11-2008, 10:57 PM | #53 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 560
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Quote:
Anyways, I just took like awhile to look over my work and comparing the only other piece of detailed information I found on a correct 12 tone scale. It seems like my scale was actually just the perfect fifth, or the second harmonic past the octave of C. It turns out I have more work to do to develop the full twelve tone scale, and some more reading to comprehend it. Thank you for pointing this out, as I was hoping someone with some acoustic theory under their belt could help me. However, looking at the holes in my data, it points to a more interesting conclusion that makes much more sense. So forget my data so far haha. I'll get back to you guys when I rework all this out as its more complicated than I thought. Also, if you can let me know if the twelve tone scale looks "perfect" to you on the website. I need to prove it mathematically first before using it, however, it disregards A as not 432, which I was apprehensive to go against. Back to the drawing board... |
|
11-11-2008, 11:11 PM | #54 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 560
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Quote:
|
|
11-11-2008, 11:14 PM | #55 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 560
|
Re: Cracking the Code
However, there is a HUGE difference between linear and exponential acceleration (aka power, first and second). I can tell that time may seem to be linear, but I sure am experiencing it in an exponential fashion :-p That's a thinker for ya hehe.
|
11-11-2008, 11:51 PM | #56 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: england
Posts: 254
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Quote:
Thanks for the reply..... Very interesting and informative....and I love the hobbit tree house idea. |
|
11-12-2008, 12:13 AM | #57 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 187
|
Re: Cracking the Code
WOW. Nice work guys...
|
11-12-2008, 01:00 AM | #58 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 47
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Nice links lee Burton. Thanks
|
11-12-2008, 01:23 AM | #59 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 560
|
Re: Cracking the Code
I came across something inteseting while trying to ratify the concept if you can turn infinties into quantum numbers, specifically divisors of 9. Anyways, its seem that all factors that have a multiple of 3 as a numerator and a non-multiple of 3 as the denominator, then you can multiply the numerator and denomator together to get the quantum number. Just another example of why 3,6,& 9 are so bad @$$ haha. For example:
Fraction Shortcut: 6/5 = 6*5 = 30 = 3+0 = 3 Traditional Way: 6/5 = 1.2 = 1+2 = 3 I tested it with a bunch of numbers and it seems pretty solid as long as the fraction doesn't produce an irrational number. The irrational numbers was what I was trying to define. However, let's take a look at the multiplication pattern of 7 (factors of 7): Second number after comma is the quantum number 7*1 = 7,7 7*2 = 14,5 7*3 = 21,3 7*4 = 28,1 7*5 = 35,8 7*6 = 42,6 7*7 = 49,4 7*8 = 56,2 7*9 = 63,9 Now think of this: 3/7=3*7=21=2+1=3. 6/7=6*7=42=4+2=6. Let's now look at 3. 3*1 = 3,3 3*2 = 6,6 3*3 = 9,9 3*4 = 12,3 3*5 = 15,6 3*6 = 18,9 3*7 = 21,3 3*8 = 24,6 3*9 = 27,9 Now you have nine thirds (aka nine one-thirds) that make up the number 3, or 9/3 (trying to make this sound simple). Apply the table to those nine-thirds, with the same notion of 7 in mind: 1/3=1*3=3 5/3=5*3=15=1+5=6 7/3=7*3=21=1+2=3 So this means we can now solve the quantum number for irrational numbers (aka infinities) as long as it can be written as a fraction! Hell ya! Also, this made me think of my ultimate math question which I can't deduce with any math: Point nine repeating... aka .999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 Now mathematicans will say that equals 9/9 or 1 but think about it; even if it does repeat on forever it's not 1! That's a mind *uck I tell ya. |
11-12-2008, 03:28 AM | #60 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: OC, CA and next...
Posts: 1,289
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Gregor, love all the work your doing... the relentless passion, its so inside you.
Your'e a fan of Thoth! Circles and angles... but, circles not angles. John Lennon must have come unglued when he realized where there lyrics came from. And Thoth was 'Hermes' the trickster as well, to protect against the ego mind extremes like Adolf, whom knew quite a bit but was not allowing subtlety to operate of its own accord. Awesome drawing you put together! |
11-12-2008, 05:34 AM | #61 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: va, us
Posts: 97
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Quote:
|
|
11-12-2008, 07:34 AM | #62 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 560
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Quote:
Oh, and I redid a bunch of my work, redid some equations, inputs blah blah blah. Anyways, scrap C and G haha. It's actually C (256hz) and F (341.3 hertz) that propagate at 90 degrees to each other. Every other note has of coarse something that propagates to it, but they are an arbitrary frequency (No common note). What's interesting is the angle that propagates perpindicular to F#, the egyptian chant note, is 555.18Hz which is in between a C# and a D. Once I am confident in these frequencies (As now it's more mathematically sound, also being I understand acoustic theory much much more now) I plan on making some didgeridoos to precise frequencies, probably C and F, to work with quartz crystal. I'll release the stuff tomorrow. I need to sleep. Namaste. |
|
11-12-2008, 11:55 AM | #63 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Derby, midlands, UK, Earth, Milky way.
Posts: 60
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Hi, Gregor great work, the didgeridoo is a good idea, but for now to save time, Google free tone generator, there's stacks of good ones.
Scalar waves operate at 180 degrees to each other, just a comment. Tom Bearden is an expert. cheers good luck |
11-12-2008, 12:08 PM | #64 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 560
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Oh I know this. However, they also generate electromagnetic fields which I cannot control. Basically it introduces an unknown variable in the system, another wave, that I don't want.
|
11-13-2008, 04:13 AM | #65 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 560
|
Re: Cracking the Code
All right, I went through and redid everything. Made a mistake within the scale, well not really. Just underestimated it. The pic of sacred harmonics from before with the circles was correct. My scale was known as the perfect fifth, which is based on the prime of three (flip-flopped with the perfect third based off the prime of 5, so confusing). Anyways, once I threw in the other primes I got the twelve note scale, and redid all the angles so it includes all perpendicular angles to all these other angles. Take a look. Many of the perpendicular angles I could not define a quantum number due to them being irrational numbers. The Q stands for quantum number. The difference if there is is the difference in between frequencies. Range set is basically what octave range a frequency is in.
|
11-13-2008, 05:03 PM | #66 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: va, us
Posts: 97
|
Re: Cracking the Code
i didn't want to make a new thread for this question but this is the most appropriate one...
why aren't marko rodin and nassim haramein collaborating?! they both live in hawaii...you'd think two geniuses would find each other on an island. they're perfect for each other! think of what 2 great minds could do together! |
11-13-2008, 05:09 PM | #67 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: england
Posts: 254
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Quote:
|
|
11-13-2008, 05:41 PM | #68 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 560
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Well torsion is based on the spin of an atom, or an object, the rotation of it. Increasing the rotation is the same in terms of speed as in a linear motion, but it is circular, which generates gravity. But in this, if you relate this to the experiment DW mentioned in Divine Cosmos, if the torsion fields are increased to a certain point, then the spacetime continuum will be inverted, aka the object which was a pyramid disappears from our perspective in this reality as I would assume that means the object reaches the speed of light. Time has been shown to be affected by torsion fields. So using the same concepts within this experiment, while refining it with some of Ed's work (using his magneto from a Ford model T which was designed by John Keely), you can speed up time and cause the plant to grow at a tremendous rate. I think this would work best if you do this in an aqueous solution (hydroponically) versus soil, with using a UV light, I feel you could indeed accelerate growth a tremendous amount. Wow, I just thought of that all right now. I think I just thought of one bad ass science experiment, and I know just the plant to use it on hehe.
|
11-13-2008, 05:41 PM | #69 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: england
Posts: 1,153
|
Re: Cracking the Code
hey greg i emailed the resonance project but it appears my emails cant get through!!!!!!!!!!! says delivery failure notification!!! i joined the mailking list and managed to reply to the conformation link... i asked if they have seen the www.code144.com video.. all these cats need to get together and do it quick.. your all on the right track!!!!!! man its gonna be a rocky next 4 years!!!!
|
11-13-2008, 05:57 PM | #70 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 99
|
Re: Cracking the Code
I've followed this same line of research and came to the same harmonic and resonate frequencies
as you did in the spreadsheet, however did not feel the need to contribute. Thank you for taking the time to present it to a broader audience... However, it's my firm belief the the time for intellectualizing is at an end, and that it's Thelema, right action of Will that manifest the beneficial outcome that is possible through this proper use of technology. In order balance the music system and make real usage of this information and sound technology it has to be put to use. I would be interested in producing a book and a product for musicians, and music lovers, with this information. And would like to come together to talk about possible approaches to doing this. My initial thoughts on how to spearhead a project like this: 1) Take the digital versions of classical pieces done by Beethoven, Mozart, and the likes, and feed them to a piece of audio generation software that has been "tuned" with the Solf. scale. Produce an array of copyright free music from these classical pieces in the correct scale. This is a start to get people hear the harmony and effect of this music in contrast to the err'ed music being produced atm. 2) Produce a mainstream book with leaders in the field that who will collaborate on the project. Establishing contact with someone who's name is already branded to music, or vibrational healing, and presenting them with a draft and get them on board. Obviously, the final goal is to publish these work and it's practical application on the shelves where "new" musicians and upcoming generations can learn about it. 3) Produce a new "tuning" harmonical and other tuning devices musicians can purchase to re-tune their instruments to the solf. freq. Something that costs, $20 - rather than $50 per tuning fork. 4) Custom order instruments from manufacturers of the upcoming "Hang Drum" or even basic guitars and stock an online store with emphasis on revolutionary music by virtue of mathematical perfection in the instruments themselves. 5) A BAND of musicians that are pleasing to a wide audience, ie alternative music, or rock and such that has it's "angle" or news worthly aspect of it's self being that the music they play is perfect - in relation to mathematical correspondences. I imagine Tesla Coils going off, alien sounding instruments and a humble personae to the members of such a band. I see these, or a integration of these on one large project with many collective minds working towards the realization of the ideal of "Retuning the music instruments of the world into divine and mathematical perfection for the healing of humanity" would be a way to actualize this information. To make this happen, a movement needs to be established. A place of communication, and a "leader" in the field to spearhead the movement and keep people inspired and motivated until it comes through to fruition... If these actions aren't taken, then nothing changes and the opportunity at hand will slip away like a fading dream. If these actions ARE taken, and taken well, you can see the actualization of a dream that will never be forgotten. Adam K. Last edited by ADAM KADMON; 11-13-2008 at 06:04 PM. |
11-13-2008, 06:29 PM | #71 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: england
Posts: 254
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Quote:
Go, go, go Arturo.....get the 'fast-food-fing' invented !!! (ps FOOD I said......can't eat weeds... ) edit to say...well we can of course (eat weeds)....but you know what I'm joking about. Last edited by jaby; 11-13-2008 at 06:33 PM. |
|
11-13-2008, 06:55 PM | #72 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 560
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Quote:
Now if you look at the list above, the base number is the lowest octave of a Solfeggio frequency that is an integer. The two of interest are 33 and 99 hertz, Mi and Ut respectively. Mi also is an octave 66 hertz. Now if you look at the ratios which are made by taken the frequency and dividing it by the note in it's upper range (396 hertz divided by 409.6 hertz, note E). The first ratio is based on the twelve note harmonic scale of primes. The second ratio is the note from a perfect fifth (what I was originally using for a scale). Both Ut and Mi have the same ratios. Both are related to factors of three of each other. Actually I just looked at Fa and La, and it applies the exact same, but not with Re and Sol. However, Re and Sol both involve the same integers but flipped around in opposite positions for each integer. '33' is also known as Christ Consciousness I believe. That's what made it stand out for me. I am pretty sure that most of the classical music is using Verni tuning, which I know is more mathematically precise but I don't know what it uses exactly, either: C256, A432, or C256/A432 (if that makes sense) for a harmonic twelve note scale. |
|
11-13-2008, 06:59 PM | #73 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 560
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Yes, I am right there with ya. However, in terms of buds or flowers, it would be the coolest thing to see them grow and open up before your eyes. Think of a rose alone. Mmmm beauty....
|
11-13-2008, 07:05 PM | #74 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: england
Posts: 254
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Quote:
I just love all those speeded up film of things growing. The 'Fast-Fing' could create LIVING ART...my head is spinning with the thought. |
|
11-13-2008, 07:57 PM | #75 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 99
|
Re: Cracking the Code
Quote:
Perhaps you can enlighten me - why is there only 12 notes in our music system? It seems odd to me there is a black key missing on the piano per octave. And my understanding of the Egyptians, is that they operated on a 13 note system. The number 13 is closer to the true workings of nature than 12. In fact, a 12 based system seems obviously flawed when we take a look at the sacred numerology and phi or Fibonacci series. Our original calendar system, and zodiac was based off of 13. And since music is geometry in time/space, why not use a system of numbers that better resembles our true time/space reality, which would be 13. |
|
|
|