Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate

elka · 10-23-2008, 09:06 PM

Bob Dean mentions Zacharia Sitchin many times in his interview, mentioning him as reliable source for information about planet X.

I would like to point out that after a few years of research on Zacharia Sitchin as an author and researcher, I came to a conclusion, that he IS NOT to be believed!!!

I was , like all of you some time ago, fascinated with his books, but than, I realized something was just not fitting the whole picture!

My fascination is an ancient history, and I read lots of books about it, and somehow Zacharia's information is completely out of the whole picture! There is absolutely no evidence on what he says!

Please check this link:

http://www.sitchiniswrong.com/sitchi...ontentpage.htm

Many people who are observant and like to search for the truth, also like to check the information they are given! Sitchin is nowhere supported by any ancient studies!

Why do you all believe Sitchin straight for anything he is claiming?

His research is complatly unsupported by anything and he should' be taken as a legitimate source!

10-23-2008, 09:06 PM	#1
elka Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: germany Posts: 31	Zacharia sitchin is not legitimate Bob Dean mentions Zacharia Sitchin many times in his interview, mentioning him as reliable source for information about planet X. I would like to point out that after a few years of research on Zacharia Sitchin as an author and researcher, I came to a conclusion, that he IS NOT to be believed!!! I was , like all of you some time ago, fascinated with his books, but than, I realized something was just not fitting the whole picture! My fascination is an ancient history, and I read lots of books about it, and somehow Zacharia's information is completely out of the whole picture! There is absolutely no evidence on what he says! Please check this link: http://www.sitchiniswrong.com/sitchi...ontentpage.htm Many people who are observant and like to search for the truth, also like to check the information they are given! Sitchin is nowhere supported by any ancient studies! Why do you all believe Sitchin straight for anything he is claiming? His research is complatly unsupported by anything and he should' be taken as a legitimate source!