JAMES: The WingMakers Interview on Camelot

[efields]

Originally Posted by Czymra

Thanks for that. I do have an odd feeling about quite some of the stuff being said. The emotional and intellectual involvement of the interviewee's of Project Camelot range from "cool American" to "righteous human defender" (no offence meant to anyone, apologies) and even though they are talking about complex and only party unveiled topics, it seems obvious that they struggle with their own demons and ignorance.
I do think that James' interview here strips many of the ideas that others so willingly bought into, I do agree with the notion of 'saving ourselves' and many other concepts that dismiss dogmas of any kind. However, I am still left wondering what's left and how this actually ties in with the life I'm leading for obviously if I can't even escape in death, what's the point? And when living, am I to act and stand thoughtless and emotionless at all times or is this just a state to 'ground' me again?

I'd just say that alignment and sincerity along with awareness of the Truth of illusion is all thats necessary in your stillness. Indeed the technique is not new. Its the realization of the lack of levels between you and the oneness, and the need to be wary of including the false profits and imaginary levels stipulated by those 'profits' trapped in the HMS, that are plentiful on this Orb that must be realized, as false, and given no reality in your
thoughts. There is really just You and the Oneness. Really just the Oneness, of which you are a part. Not apart. One with. It's a refreshing perspective as it cuts out all the Junk. You are The Creation and The Creation is you. Simple, Elegant, and Complete.

It's as if we on this Orb, in totality, are really all just 'One cell' In a Organ seen as the 'Universe' which is part of Infinity, which is the Body of which we exist in. Vast is The Creation, all that is.

[idunno]

mayim mayim mayim

Ja mes Mahi Nahi
is it french... 4.... MingDina-st-y?
hmm...

St-k-y ????????????

Phin = a Phi + b

1·61803 39887 49894 84820 45868 34365 63811 77203 09179 80576 ..More..

Multiples of Phi
We've just seen that we can use multiples of Phi to calculate its powers easily and you might think that there's not much else we can discover about multiples of Phi.

Here we show another relationship and also explain how the Rabbits family Tree diagram was made, originally seen in the Fibonacci and Nature. It's all to do with the multiples of Phi, or, rather, the fractional parts of the multiples.

[idunno]

Powers of Phi
We return to the definition of Phi, as the positive valued solution to
P(P-1)=1
P here is either of 2 values, Phi and 1-Phi.
So P has the property that P2=P+1.
Let's look at Phi2 first.
Phi squared

We can read the equation above as to find P2, just add 1 to P.

Things to do

-Use your calculator to evaluate Phi=(1+5)/2. If you have a Memory on your calculator, store this value in it.
-Square it and check that it is just Phi+1 (i.e. subtract one and compare with the Memory value).
-Use your calculator to evaluate the other value (1-Phi) or (1-Memory) = (1-5)/2
-Again square the value just found and check that it is just the same as adding 1 to the value you squared.
Now let's look at Phi3.

Phi cubed

Is there another way to calculate Phi3 apart from just Phi x Phi x Phi?
Yes - let's see how to compute it in two more ways. We use the basic P(P-1)=1 formula or, in another form, P2=P+1.
P3 is just P.P2 = P(P+1) by our "basic formula", which expands to P2+P

...now that's interesting!... 1 + P = P2 AND P + P2 = P3 ...hmmm! Is there anything in this do you think?
Question: How could this be generalized? We'll use this result in the next sub-section about a Phi-bonacci Brick... but, for now, let's get back to the original equation...
and P2 + P = (P+1) + P after using the "basic formula" again and this is just 2P + 1. So
Phi3 = 1 + 2 Phi
Notice that this needs just one multiplication rather than two if we evaluated Phi x Phi x Phi. That's the first quick way.
The second answer was spotted by Scott Beach but it is also in the table at the foot of this page: since Phi=(√5+1)/2 then 2Phi is √5+1 and 1+ 2 Phi = &radic 5 + 2:

Phi3 = 2 + √5
Interesting Facts about a Phi-bonacci Brick

[This variation was suggested by Hud Nordin of Sunnyvale, California.]
If we have a brick with sides of lengths 1, Phi=1·61803... and phi=1/Phi=0·61803... then:-
the longest side is the sum of the other two lengths since 1 + phi = Phi
the largest face (area C=1 x Phi) is the sum of the other two face's areas (area A =1 x phi and area B=phi x Phi) since
Area A + Area B
= 1 x phi + phi x Phi
= phi + 1
= Phi
= Area C
The next three interesting facts and figures on the Phibonacci brick were first pointed out by Donald Seitz in The Mathematics Teacher, 1986, pages 340-341 in an article entitled A Geometric Figure Relating the Golden Ratio to Pi.
What is the surface area S of the brick?
Above we saw that the sum of the 2 smaller face's areas equals the largest face's area, and that this is Phi.
Since there are 2 faces with smallest area, 2 of middle-sized area (which total 2 times the largest face area, that is 2 Phi) and we also have two other faces of the largest area (Phi) , then:

The surface area of the brick is 4 Phi

How long is the diagonal across the brick?
Another surprise awaits us when we calculate the length of the diagonal across the brick.
The formula is a 3-dimensional analogue of Pythagoras Theorem.
For a rectangle of sides x and y, its diagonal is (x2 + y2).
For a 3-D brick with sides x,y and z, its diagonal has length (x2 + y2 + z2).
So how long is the diagonal of our Phi-bonacci brick? Since its sides (x,y and z) are 1, Phi and phi, the length of its diagonal is: (12 + Phi2 + phi2). I'll leave you to check the algebra but the surprisingly simple answer is

The diagonal of the brick has length 2
A relationship between Phi and Pi

Things to do

just a
......Quote
TruthSeeker7
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/fo...ge454148/pg296

TruthSeeker7
User ID: 384266
3/3/2008 2:07 AM Re: 17P/Holmes - Enigma 'Comet' is back in the night skies!
QUOTE

A great sign from the heavens is due. No doubt about it. One final last great sign.


57th TONY AWARDS MAN OF LA MANCHA
[link to youtube.com]

And who knows for sure. Maybe "comet" Holmes is not done.

the above video is about a dream i had and the sign from the heavens.[/QUOTE]
Quoting: * <----star of destiny




Thank you for that

A song for the hero in all of us.

It takes great courage just to live in this day and age.

a nu n
all is repeated
^n-time ...now
mobius-book.....
We Have Died and Gone to Mobius ...
or is it from REaM to bbiooas?

[Czymra]

Originally Posted by efields

I'd just say that alignment and sincerity along with awareness of the Truth of illusion is all thats necessary in your stillness. Indeed the technique is not new. Its the realization of the lack of levels between you and the oneness, and the need to be wary of including the false profits and imaginary levels stipulated by those 'profits' trapped in the HMS, that are plentiful on this Orb that must be realized, as false, and given no reality in your
thoughts. There is really just You and the Oneness. Really just the Oneness, of which you are a part. Not apart. One with. It's a refreshing perspective as it cuts out all the Junk. You are The Creation and The Creation is you. Simple, Elegant, and Complete.

It's as if we on this Orb, in totality, are really all just 'One cell' In a Organ seen as the 'Universe' which is part of Infinity, which is the Body of which we exist in. Vast is The Creation, all that is.

That's nothing new to me either in fact, maybe that's why I'm confused. It's basically Zen isn't it? (No I don't mean the 'style'.)

[Christina Sila]

Milk and honey:

As you indicated above, “quantum pause” breathing may not be anything new, however it is new to me. I’m delighted that James offered up the recommendation for the practice of quantum pause breathing, for I’m now integrating that into the disciplines I’ve already embraced. And you’re correct in that the utility of quantum pause does not prove that GSSC = HMS.

I guess what I really wanted to say in the brief post above is that rather than attacking any of the James interview content that shakes my belief system, I chose to take what seems useful to me and leave the rest… for now.

[milk and honey]

Originally Posted by Christina Sila

Milk and honey:

As you indicated above, “quantum pause” breathing may not be anything new, however it is new to me. I’m delighted that James offered up the recommendation for the practice of quantum pause breathing, for I’m now integrating that into the disciplines I’ve already embraced. And you’re correct in that the utility of quantum pause does not prove that GSSC = HMS.

It doesn't concern you that James "translated" the technique from the "tributary zone" for the first time ever? - after a portal opened in 1998 for the first time ever?

Originally Posted by Christina Sila

I guess what I really wanted to say in the brief post above is that rather than attacking any of the James interview content that shakes my belief system, I chose to take what seems useful to me and leave the rest… for now.

I'm not 'attacking' James by exposing his hypocrisy, his plaigerism, his dis-ingenuity and his shillery for the PTB.

Secondly, you assume that any such commentary of my own must be based merely on my personal beliefs being shaken by the WMM. Have you considered that the WMM is based on plaigerism, internet conspiracies and James' personal beliefs? And that considering some of the other things he has to say in support of the agenda of the PTB that his motive is questionable? Or the possibility that my own commentary is based on truth rather than belief?