|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: OC/CALIFORNIA
Posts: 587
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Out of Body
Posts: 98
|
Quote:
I read once that a thought remains alive and well forever until/unless it is 'un'-thought by the original thinker. I'm always amazed at how different my perception is when I re-think a thought several years later; i.e. re-reading a book. or re-listening to some old tapes, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 170
|
I'm sitting here thinking about this and I've never considered this as a law. It seems to be a decision you make: To what degree will you leave things as they are and what degree will you respond to things and in what way. What will produce the most benefit.
If you think about it intensely. Angering someone by telling them about the lies in society. Doing anything! Who's weakness is it really? Are you harming them or are they harming themself, or are you harming you? Should you let their anger purify them or should you wait until they take the initiative to learn, or should you go ahead and see what happens when you say the truth anyway? I think it makes no difference......No matter what you decide the laws of nature already got everything covered. It's impossible to not act perfectly. Any imperfection is a decision. You can decide it's imperfect action. This is yet more perfect action. Nature wins and the law of allowance has become another aspect of nature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: OC/CALIFORNIA
Posts: 587
|
Quote:
Very good words Dean, thank you for the insight. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|