North and south pole pictures – VERY IMPORTANT! Have you seen this?

[KathyT]

Average Joe, I don’t think you read my post entirely, or looked at the photos in my photo album, or read the links.
The blue square think isn’t just a blue square thing. I’ve watched the north pole for days. The blue screen overlay changes shape, sometimes a triangle, sometimes a rectangle, sometimes it has five sides, sometimes I have seen multiple overlays. I’ve seen a round shape, I have kept a copy. The north pole is ALWAYS covered with something. Why is that?
I’ve been a computer programmer for 25 years, I work heavily with Photoshop and photography. I do not believe it is a glitch in processing. I have overlayed photography using layers in Photoshop, I know it can be done with other technology.

I do agree Google earth has assembled and put together photo images, particularly for the base map, as the whole earth of the base map is without clouds. However, the weather layer is refreshed every few hours, and each time they do, it’s another interesting blue screen at the north pole, another shape. AND, the base layer has never shown a true picture of the frozen artic ICE cap, which is always there. They show pictures of my house, and I can zoom down in close, but they show NOTHING of the north pole ICE cap. Why is that? That’s what I call hiding something from us.

And the South pole with the different center circle… which is hundreds if not thousands of miles across.. why is it different than all the other part of Antarctica? It’s all ice, why the big round circle? The whole part of the center round circle appears to be smudged… I’ve looked at it with Photoshop, down to the pixel level. There is nothing like the huge circle anywhere else on Google Earth. Do you use Photoshop? Are you familiar with uses the Curves tool? It allows you to select specific tones in a photo, and adjust them. If you looked at my adjusted photo, you will see that I couldn’t darken the center of the photo, right over the very top of the south pole. It had something so bright there, it could not darken like the surrounding area. And the whole big round circle is very smudged, and if you zoom in you can see that, and it’s really evident with Photoshop. A classic example, just like they did with the Mars Hale Crator photo, which I have worked with, to distort what is really there. The average person has no clue there is something differently wrong when you look at a basically light or white area, like the Antartica. But take someone with photo tools, and you’ll be amazed at what you can draw out.

All I want, is for NASA to come clean, and show us real photos. Show us the entire ICE cap at the North Pole, and a real new photo with no smudging, of the entire South pole. Is that too much to ask?

[karelia]

Hi Kathy,
I have no doubt the earth (and other planets) is hollow. see holloworbs.com, which contains a few "old' (pre-1900s) accounts of anecdotal evidence as well as newer ones. Also Project Camelot published a pdf file of an account of one who seemingly escaped from below the South/North Pole (forgot which it was) a while ago, which I found interesting if disturbing.

[storm4ce]

Hi Karelia, can you please share the link for the pdf you got from projectcamelot. Thank you in advance.

[feeler]

Originally Posted by storm4ce

Hi Karelia, can you please share the link for the pdf you got from projectcamelot. Thank you in advance.

Not only is the earth hollow, the earth is expanding, pushing the continents apart. During those days when the earth was smaller, reduced gravity supported the much larger life forms. Refer to Nassim Haramein's Unified Field Theory.

[storm4ce]

Originally Posted by feeler

Not only is the earth hollow, the earth is expanding, pushing the continents apart. During those days when the earth was smaller, reduced gravity supported the much larger life forms.

Yes. Thats true. Earth is expanding just like all other objects in this universe are expanding and we all know know that the universe itself is expanding.

[371]

Originally Posted by storm4ce

can you please share the link for the pdf you got from projectcamelot. Thank you in advance.

You can find it HERE

Unfortunately, its mostly in German and the parts that i have translated (I recommend Google translator) are out there to say the least... still quite interesting though.

[Average Joe]

Originally Posted by KathyT

Average Joe, I don’t think you read my post entirely, or looked at the photos in my photo album, or read the links.
The blue square think isn’t just a blue square thing. I’ve watched the north pole for days. The blue screen overlay changes shape, sometimes a triangle, sometimes a rectangle, sometimes it has five sides, sometimes I have seen multiple overlays. I’ve seen a round shape, I have kept a copy. The north pole is ALWAYS covered with something. Why is that?

Hi Kathy. To answer your point. If one thinks that the blue square is simply a lack of weather coverage, which to be honest is what it blatantly is, there is no real reason to be suspicious that the blue square, or satellite blind spot, changes shape and even slightly location. The world is turning, the satelites are orbiting, I don't think weather satellites are geo-stationary.

Don't forget that the images will be processed with images from mulitple satellites, they aren't covering the poles, but if data is missing at one collation interval from a couple of satellites which cover one area then the blind spot will be distorted towards them as that data is not there. Then at the next point, data is missing from other satellites then the dataless blind spot will extend towards their path.

So you have a permanent blind spot at the pole which is always there, but it extends and changes shape one way or another depending on what data is collected (or lack thereof) from the satellites that orbit near the pole.