Hollow Earth/google earth/proof?

[KathyT]

Originally Posted by micjer

We have two threads on same subject .. should merge them together.
http://projectavalon.net/forum/showthread.php?t=7712

But when you do merge threads, the responses to each other get all mixed up and it is hard to follow. I say leave them alone.

[micjer]

Originally Posted by KathyT

But when you do merge threads, the responses to each other get all mixed up and it is hard to follow. I say leave them alone.

no problem the link is there for anyone if they are interested.

I really like that one photo you found of the north pole winds from Nasa.

Sure looks like something is there even though distorted.

Originally Posted by smat

Thanks for your reality check Zorgon.
It is so good to know that in these dangerous global climatic times that Nasa and the people who control all the satellites don't think that anything going on at the north or south poles is anything of concern to joe public.

I do not have any love for NASA either and work hard to show what they are hiding and to uncover the secret space program. However in the quest for truth, you must use reality checks from time to time or you end up looking foolish and loose all credibility

The North Pole

Well at the North Pole... the Ice may completely melt this next summer... which will start an OIL RUSH to drill in the Arctic... and the Russians will get there first

That will make it really rough on Santa Claus and explaining to the Kids where Santa's workshop went to... seeing as there is no land below the ice at the North pole... this will be an interesting situation

The reason for the melt is the NATURAL planetary warming cycle that happens like clockwork every so many years. I will show that in a minute.

Now those that believe there is a hole at the North Pole leading to the center of the Earth... please explain to me how the water below the ice... (which has a thickness of 1.8 to 2.4 meters.) is stopped from draining into the hole? Considering the average depth of the Arctic Ocean below the ice is 1038 m (3410 ft). The deepest point is in the Eurasian Basin, at 5450 m (17900 ft).

Do you know how much pressure that much water would create?

Here is an example what happens with a 12 inch (1 foot) hole...

VORTEX OF DOOM
Louisiana Sink Hole Drains Entire Lake
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4Of8cm0kS8

So I think that kills the hole at the North pole hmmm?

continued...

The South Pole

Very close to the South Pole in Antarctica like Lake Vostok. It is buried deep below the ice under the Russian Vostok base (hence the name)

This lake has not seen the light of day for 420,000 years. It is miles below the ice but is NOT FROZEN. Kept warm by geothermal vents...

They drilled down to the lake... but as they got close they started finding unknown organisms in the ice. So it dawned on them that releasing living organisms from 1/2 million years ago into our environment might not be a good idea

Ya think?

So NASA is sending a probe to go down... sealling the hole behind itself... the same probe they plan to dig into the ice on Europa to see what lies beneath.

But there is something else interesting. ICE CORE SAMPLES. These core sampls, like the rings on a tree, show global temperatures for the last 400,000 years. An accurate record of ice density.

Here is the result of the ice core data...



THIS folkes is the TRUTH about Global Warming... Sure we pollute and need to stop... but we are NOT the cause of Global Warming

Broken down to a finer tune and smaller time scale (2000 years) we see this result...



If you google the "Mini Ice Age" you will find it corresponds with this chart... and that was the time when fireplaces were invented as the climate cooled and those drafty castles with no windows now needed heat, glass panes and tapestries on the wall for the cold...

Back to the South Pole...

IF there was a hole at the south pole, how do you explain the glass dome that is there? No you cannot see it on google earth as there are no polar orbiting image satellites but I have photos







But I suppose many might say that the Hole is UNDER the Dome

Well I suppose it COULD be true... that the Dome is hiding something... but you will have to ask the Penguins... only THEY know for sure

[LaRosa]

Great post Zorgon! This fascinate me, and I followed the lake Vostok a couple years back, it is a very controversial subject.

Included is the picture of the NASA probe sealling the hole behind itself. Also a map of where you can see the differents country claims of the South Pole

Enjoy!

EDIT: the map is ridiculously small once I uploaded here, how did you get thoses bigger picture to show properly in your post?

[e22]

hello zorgon,

Originally Posted by zorgon

Well at the North Pole... the Ice may completely melt this next summer... which will start an OIL RUSH to drill in the Arctic... and the Russians will get there first
continued...

didnt the russians plant a flag under the sea arctic sea floor last year?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle2186118.ece

Originally Posted by zorgon

Now those that believe there is a hole at the North Pole leading to the center of the Earth... please explain to me how the water below the ice... (which has a thickness of 1.8 to 2.4 meters.) is stopped from draining into the hole? Considering the average depth of the Arctic Ocean below the ice is 1038 m (3410 ft). The deepest point is in the Eurasian Basin, at 5450 m (17900 ft).

i found this picture in orion conspiracy video


seems pretty interesting

1) there are also reports of radioactive snow falling after 20 months of chernobyl disaster in the antarctic

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...is_/ai_9027937

2)you should have heared about some animals moving towards the north pole during winter

3) weather prediction if we can predict weather we should be able to predict weather for further times but it is not possible due to some other influence as nassim haramein says it

4)seismic activity as i mentioned this video in my previous post

5)next thing is aurora they say that charged parcticle coming from the sun is not enough to cause the glow something else is charging up the particle
to cause the glowing effect

the evidence seems quite convincing to me and i do believe in the central sun
as the energy emitted by all the planet is more than what it receives from the sun

Originally Posted by Thrustbucket

Bother everyone? I happen to be quite open minded to the composition of the inside of the earth. I take issue with anyone that says they know for a "fact" what the inside of the earth is like.

i am sorry for being so harsh last time im just frustrated,every information
is there on the internet easily accessable i just want you people to do your research and understand properly what you are doing.

and could some one please create a profile for nassim haramein in the wikipedia i respect his work so much
some one seems to be deleting my entry on nassim haramein in the wikipedia

[smat]

Thanks for all your posts guys.
I really appreciate them.

Have you listened to Richard Hoagland's interview on 'Coast to Coast' radio show with Art Bell. It is really interesting. (2001 I think this was)

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XbK8H3wR2PM

also here is an interesting article.

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@lis.../msg94027.html


The bulge of water going round the earth is said to be caused by the moon.
This is probably true, but I also think that something else is involved which makes this bulge of water bigger. That is centrifugal force. The Earth spins on an axis at the poles, centrifugal force causes the bulge and a pole shift would send that water god knows where.

How would you think that a pole shift would effect the moon?
Surely for the poles to shift the speed of rotation of the earth would change.
Would the moon get closer if the speed of rotation of the earth slowed down?

[Jacqui D]

All great pictures you have posted thanks everyone.
i have been following the pics also on google earth really strange!

Would this be the opening that Hitler during the second world war flew his pilots into to find the centre of the earth. The hollow world etc?

Originally Posted by smat

That is centrifugal force. The Earth spins on an axis at the poles, centrifugal force causes the bulge and a pole shift would send that water god knows where.

How would you think that a pole shift would effect the moon?
Surely for the poles to shift the speed of rotation of the earth would change.
Would the moon get closer if the speed of rotation of the earth slowed down?

The pole shift has absolutely nothing to do with the rotation of the Earth... it is the MAGNETIC FIELD that is changing...

The North Pole and the North MAGNETIC pole that compasses point to are NOT the same...

When the poles flip, as they have done many times in the past, all compasses will now point SOUTH but the EARTH is not going to move..

The Sun flips its poles every 11 years like clockwork... Bet you never noticed a thing...

Originally Posted by e22

5)next thing is aurora they say that charged parcticle coming from the sun is not enough to cause the glow something else is charging up the particle
to cause the glowing effect

Really? who exactly are 'they' and what is this 'something else'?

[e22]

Originally Posted by zorgon

Really? who exactly are 'they'

i was refering to the scientists when is say "they".

Originally Posted by zorgon

what is this 'something else'?

here's a quote from one of the website

It seems to me as if the vast majority of charged particles which create the aurora do indeed come from the Sun originally (but are accelerated by the Earth itself). There are some particles, like the pulsating aurora for instance, which seem to have a definite earthly origin. All these particles might be accelerated and controlled by a small Inner Sun which is floating at the centre of the Earth thereby causing the aurora

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ti...a_hueca_8j.htm
http://www.hollowplanets.com/hpch10.asp
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...roraseason.htm
http://www.space.gc.ca/asc/eng/scien...a_borealis.asp
http://www.crystalinks.com/aurora.html
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/...ra_(astronomy)

Originally Posted by LaRosa

how did you get thoses bigger picture to show properly in your post?

click on this icon in post and paste the picture link

[sunnyrap]

From all these charts and graphs, it appears Earth's surface has spent the bulk of its time being inhospitable to life...yet every time there is a temperate spell, life springs back into action, according to fossil and ice yields. Hmmm. Makes a case for 'something' reintroducing life each time a peak happens. Where oh where are the introducers hanging out? Maybe during one of those longer peaks, they built more suitable accommodations on/inside the planet?

[Antaletriangle]

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=iusq6j8cG1o
yeah i've just checked google earth and this rectangular,orange shape @50 miles in length is still there with a black oblong shape near to it.Unsure whether or not it's some satellite mapping malfunction?Strange whatever it is.

[EYES WIDE OPEN]

Bump.

[KathyT]

Many of you may be familiar with Google’s “Google Earth”.

There is a similar software product provided by NASA, it is called “NASA World Wind”. The history of this software is explained here on Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_World_Wind

When I recently became aware of NASA’s World Wind, I immediately went looking for what they would show of both poles… would it again be a “cover up”?

You decide.

Here is the North Pole via World Wind. Clouds and weather across the continents and artic ocean area, snow or ice on northern Canada, Russia, Greenland is a continent of ice… but what is that being blurred out at and around the North Pole area?


This is zooming in… Greenland is still in photo. But what are we seeing of the Artic ocean?


For those of you who are not familiar with what satellite photography can get you, here is an example of the detail one can get of San Francisco, on World Wind… very zoomed in, lots of detail, streets and buildings… I could have zoomed in further.


But when you zoom in to look for the detail on the top of Greenland… you can’t get the same level of detail ... why no detail? You can see the inset image in the upper right showing the location of Greenland.


My only conclusion, is that NASA won’t show us true aerial or satellite photography of the approximate 2000 square mile area of the north arctic ocean area. What could be there they don’t want us to see?

Here's the World Wind South pole image:


And when you begin to zoom in, lots of white:


When I use Photoshop's Adustment Curves tool, to darken tones it can identify, I get this. Notice the appearance of brush marks, the shading strokes don't go in straight lines, they look feathered. Even across the ocean in the upper left, the shading looks feathered. All the interesting geometrical patterns across the continents on the right and lower parts can not be a natural occurrence in nature.


I demonstrate the effect of changing tone ranges in the image so that you can see the detail that the eye normally glances over. Go back to the first South pole image, and see if you would have noticed the feathered curves of what appears to be brush strokes to blur and smudge the real image.

For me, it raises a lot of questions… what is being blurred out so that we can’t see the real Antarctica and South Pole, and the real North Pole and arctic ice, from an aerial perspective? Is there something significant there which must be kept hidden from the world? Why all this effort to blur out what is at the Poles to the general public????

Does it concern me? Yes I am concerned. I am still searching for links to specific reliable aerial/satellite pictures of either pole.

[KathyT]

Originally Posted by zorgon

REALITY CHECK



Get over it...
Get on with it...

And lets show that there really IS intelligent life on this old rock, shall we?

Zorgon,
I have no clue where you got your photo, because you don't give us a reference to the site.

This government website shows Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellites by NOAA
http://sos.noaa.gov/datasets/Atmosphere/poes.html. They have two video links there showing the path of the polar-orbiting satellites, here's one http://sos.noaa.gov/videos/poes.mov They say it takes only 102 minutes for a satellite to make one circle of the globe. That's darn FAST!


Here's a representation of polar satellite paths and it comes from http://hollowplanet.blogspot.com/


Here's another representation of the polar satellite paths and this comes from website
http://www.newmediastudio.org/DataDi...ar_Orbits.html

"Most of the near polar meteorological satellites ensure complete global coverage of the Earth, during one day, thanks to a ground swath of about 3300 km." This is how they can have so many weather satellite photos, including what is refreshed frequently on Google earth.

[KathyT]

Here is an interesting story, of a gentleman who spoke to an airline pilot who has seen the polar opening... video on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oqkvOL08lI

[greenelephant]

I dont know if anyone is aware of this. But incase you dont here's a good website to have a look

http://www.npiee.org


These people seem pretty serious about their quest.

[Humble Janitor]

Originally Posted by greenelephant

I dont know if anyone is aware of this. But incase you dont here's a good website to have a look

http://www.npiee.org


These people seem pretty serious about their quest.

Interesting! I hope this gets off the ground and succeeds.

[DJModer]

Stan Deyo has something related to the hollow earth theory too. He didn't say it, but it is in his planet model simulations and experiments.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...79614108378695

[DJModer]

I have found a high resolution image of Antarctica which has a higher resolution than that in google earth

http://lima.usgs.gov/


If you zoom out to get the overall view of the Antarctica, you will see a big circle area plus some triangle area.



When you zoom in at the edge of this circle, you will see this



And the image at the highest resolution



IMO, someone intentionally reduced the resolution of the image. It should have been a better cover up if it is a missing strip of image. This doesn't prove that the earth is hollow, but it is a prove that something is going on at the south pole.

[Unified Serenity]

Here is a pic from the Cryosphere site :


Northern Hemisphere

[KathyT]

This video (from NASA), taken from a polar orbiting satellite, shows what appears to be a dark oval of an opening to the hollow Earth. The region immediately above the northern coast of Greenland where there should be only ice, you will see the oval. It also shows weather patterns streaming from this dark oval.

[Phtha]

Originally Posted by smat

Hi Guys, have any of you got google earth?
If you have, try running it and zooming in on Antarctica.
There appears to be a black hole there, don't be alarmed, I don't think it is going to engulf the world or anything, but it is possibly linked to 'Precession of the Equinox and 2012.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJU2cp1XbjQ

About google earth,
that is not a black hole but spherical UV maps that are placed on the sphere in
order to texture it. When uv mapping a sphere it is impossible to get a seemless
uv layout without those stretch marks on the poles. You will see the same thing on the other
side of the globe.

They could have uv mapped the globe/sphere a little differently to get rid of
those streches, but it would have made texturing a literal blackmary for the
people who work on it.