Message from Atmos - Siriam May 18th

[Triaxis]

Atmos talks about Universal Laws, but it seems that he/she has somewhat deviated from his/her interpretation the law of free will.

It seems Atmos crowd (Sirians) wish to impinge on Humanity’s collective free will in the form of “benign” intervention. This is in direct opposition to the free will law, so as such, can we assume that he/she represents an off world illuminati collective?

The form the “benign” intervention takes would be nice to know. As would the form of ascension they have in mind. The bitterest poison is often laced with honey…….

Personally, I will choose to keep my own energy and power and find my own path, rather than surrender my free will to them, and let them “lead” me to an unknown fate.

The universal law of free will will ensure that I keep that privilege, despite the decisions the rest of my collective (humanity) choose.

If they have the solution, then who created the problem, and engineered the reaction?

This message smacks of condescension, and of a superiority complex. This too, should set alarm bells ringing in some minds…..

[micjer]

Originally Posted by Triaxis

Atmos talks about Universal Laws, but it seems that he/she has somewhat deviated from his/her interpretation the law of free will.

It seems Atmos crowd (Sirians) wish to impinge on Humanity’s collective free will in the form of “benign” intervention. This is in direct opposition to the free will law, so as such, can we assume that he/she represents an off world illuminati collective?

The form the “benign” intervention takes would be nice to know. As would the form of ascension they have in mind. The bitterest poison is often laced with honey…….

Personally, I will choose to keep my own energy and power and find my own path, rather than surrender my free will to them, and let them “lead” me to an unknown fate



The universal law of free will will ensure that I keep that privilege, despite the decisions the rest of my collective (humanity) choose.

If they have the solution, then who created the problem, and engineered the reaction?

This message smacks of condescension, and of a superiority complex. This too, should set alarm bells ringing in some minds…..

As I read the words, something in my head told me to be carefull. They are wonderful words....maybe too wonderful.

There are a few red flags in this passage as far as I am concerned.


No matter what .... DO NOT GIVE UP YOUR FREE WILL


We should be taking responsibilty for OUR pollution. Don't expect anyone to clean it up for us.

I don't believe anyone is going to save us in spaceships that have good intentions.

Trading of technology is why we are in trouble to begin with IMO. Don't trust the Greys.

We have to stop looking outwards for the answers. The answers are within.

[Triaxis]

Originally Posted by micjer

I don't believe anyone is going to save us in spaceships that have good intentions.

Trading of technology is why we are in trouble to begin with IMO. Don't trust the Greys.

We have to stop looking outwards for the answers. The answers are within.

Precisely.

Their concept of benign may well be along the lines of George Bush's concept of freedom and democracy............

Maybe they want to save the planet by knocking us all off.

Maybe their idea of ascension is to grab hold of the global harrp system and blank slate us all.

Or maybe they are actually benign and merely wish to impose a positive theocracy on us.

None of the above particularly appeal to me, the reason being that it impinges on our free will.

Originally Posted by micjer

Personally, if other beings care to help with the problem
of pollution of our seas and soil and the negative energies
surrounding the planet - that is fine with me.
If this is 'intervention' I say 'thank you' and bring it on.

I wonder how we are meant to spiritually evolve (or devolve) without the polarities?

It's all about choice surely? Source intelligence wouldn't have set it up this way otherwise, and I believe source doesn't particularly care which way we want to go. But we need to make a choice, and we need those polarities to do so.

I wouldn't worry about Earth. Earth will outlast humanity easily. It may take a million years in time space to heal the damage, but 1 million years is but a blink of the eye once one steps out of time space.

Choose positive, and you may well re-incarnate to that time in your next life and live in utopia.

[Seashore]

Originally Posted by Triaxis

Their concept of benign may well be along the lines of George Bush's concept of freedom and democracy............

Thanks for a good laugh! I needed that...

[Jonathon]

Falls in perfectly with LLresearch and the Law of One material (starts in the 1981 transcripts of LLresearch). I would urge anyone who wishes to judge this contact to familiarize themselves with the material mentioned. All questions and perceptions of threat here are thoroughly and easily answered in the material. Should you choose to judge without fully educating yourselves to the nature of this and/or this type of contact, then that is your choice however unfortunate. Time to let go of fear and the paying of allegiance through it to your perceived enemies by understanding what they are, how and why they manifest, and what your role is. The Law of One material was critical to this understanding for myself and I can't recommend it enough. In many ways the very glue that binds all of the other information together. The definitive binder in my opinion.

It concerns me that many get so hung up on attacking the reliability of the source... then empowering a stream of gossip behind it, such as "so-and-so says this is disinfo", or "this is an illuminati trick... I know because..." as if they are some kind of authority on either. The reliability is contained within the message itself, not in it's sender. There are even greedy TV evangelists that, on occasion, say something supremely valid/valuable. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater to fill some sort of need to control or pigeon-hole data you do not wish to receive, or worse, you do not wish someone else to receive; or because you fear where the information may lead you. All information is good information for it reveals truth either in the presentation of it, the lack of it or in some combination of the two. It's simply a matter of what you do or don't do with what is revealed or not revealed within it. EG I may find the greatest truth in a chipped and dirty rock where you might say "it's just a freakin rock..." If it's just a freakin rock, how, then, does it become such a threat? What is it about the rock that inspires such time and energy to destroy it? It's only a rock after all =)

My humble opinion.