Syphoning

[milk and honey]

Hi Czyrma... Put my toe in a couple weeks back when life shanghied me again but i've been reading along enjoying this one. Your questions arise from deep within and aside from some of the very insightful replies, you as often answer them yourself by your own similarly inscrutable contemplations.

From where i sit, Dakini seems to have simplified her gnosis and finds (for others) the appropriate words to express. Some others, while equally touching the hem of reality, as often tear it asunder, so to speak. This quote for example was written by Sun-Toon not Bronte:

It seems the idea of whether or not we should surrender our egos to God, or universal Oneness, is the dividing line between spiritual paths. Do we take our individual sovereign consciousness and become actual co-creators, or do we merge into the void. Personally, the void holds no attraction for me, especially since it's not a void at all, it's another conscious mind...a very large one, and it's not mine. Therefore I do not want to assimilate with it, and I'm tired of being deluded and siphoned by it.

The sentiment expressed here accords with Bronte's but is based on a misunderstanding of 'merging with the higher-Self or Oneness'. They're hearing alarm bells ring because 'union' seems to them an abrogation of freewill and individuality and this precisely because of their belief in some of the tenets of Kyle Griffiths' cosmology.

As i see it, those ideas, though valid as a description of lower order entities - we don't want 'union' with them - are utterly false when considering 'union' with the Divine. And by 'Divine' i mean the spiritual origin of one's own being NOT some inexpressible 'void' created by cosmic parasites. The soul is the 'child' of the spiritual- Self. It is individual and sovereign and it's projection into matter is by agreement with the spiritual-Self. A soul is part of that greater being yet is free to choose the guiding Will of spirit (and thereby recieve the greater intelligence and empowerment of co-creativity with that greater being) or to forge an outer identity based on personal standards of relative good and evil. One leads to higher levels of self-realisation and the other to deeper levels of estrangement and ignor-ance of source.

With this perspective, there is indeed "an outside" to the box of fear and suspicion which causes souls to seek 'safety' by rejecting the gems of wisdom handed on from the mystics who've gone before us.

Just the act of thinking like this is liberating. It takes the siphoning concept all the way to the top...because it is above, as it is below.
There is an outside to all of this.

Syphoning does not go "all the way to the top". It is done by rogues who can only syphon souls who are vulnerable to it and that means those who have not found union with the (vibrational) "top" of their own being. The first liberating thought is that this is in fact possible and further that it is mandated by the Divine as a natural completion of the aeonic sojourn. It cannot happen without acceptance of the inner-Guide... The one that whispers questions through the window of inner-consciousness and answers from the same place... I AM.

Ah Czymra, you do it often.