Two time lines to nuclear war.

As is said in one of the Camelot interviews, the ETs can neutralize atomic weapons if they really want to. The nukes that are out there now, apart from all the other weapons we don't really know enough about can bring about catastrophic conditions to the planet, but I know the ETs have fixed some problems caused by past nuclear detonations, I am not totally sure if they will do it again or not, but I will tell you this at the moment I definitely see (like the interviews say) two streams of possible future outcomes in existence right now (and I am far from an academic believe me). That is why I would like some of the other television programmers that are more free thinking to interview Bill and Kerry and get the message out there, because I would like as many people in the world, ordinary people to focus light and healing on the negatives in the world so we can stay on the positive timeline of future I can see, rather than the other one, if that makes any sense, as I said I am not an academic.

[Pomguymguy]

Originally Posted by Tuza

As is said in one of the Camelot interviews, the ETs can neutralize atomic weapons if they really want to. The nukes that are out there now, apart from all the other weapons we don't really know enough about can bring about catastrophic conditions to the planet, but I know the ETs have fixed some problems caused by past nuclear detonations, I am not totally sure if they will do it again or not, but I will tell you this at the moment I definitely see (like the interviews say) two streams of possible future outcomes in existence right now (and I am far from an academic believe me). That is why I would like some of the other television programmers that are more free thinking to interview Bill and Kerry and get the message out there, because I would like as many people in the world, ordinary people to focus light and healing on the negatives in the world so we can stay on the positive timeline of future I can see, rather than the other one, if that makes any sense, as I said I am not an academic.

We seem to be constantly bombarded by the "controlled" media reporting that how real the possibility of "Nuke" strikes is real and is mentioned by many in a most nonchalant way. Was it dear old President Ronnie who was quoted as saying " Nuke the b******"s (Russia)

So what threat is this "Nuke" thing anyway ? Maybe this will put a bit of light on the subject. Yesterday, Tuesday 30th October I watched a repeat episode of the UK"s Antiques Roadshow, from 2006 from Norwich Cathedral !
On a table were two items, totally wothless in $ terms BUT one was a small rice bowl and the other a small dish which were picked up on the ground at a place 6 miles from the center of Hiroshima in 1945 - Both had signs that the outer glazed was blistered and had melted ! When these pots were firsr made an oven firing temperature of approx 1300 degees centigrade was required - therefore to melt the glaze AGAIN would have required a temperature above 1300c - This was six miles from the center of the Hiroshima blast ! - This "technology" was primative - to say the least - to what would be unleashed on innocent people today. ( Approx 140000 died at Hiroshima - a mere drop in the ocean for the "Elite" to be too concerned about)

There are so many iff's and but's here with what might or might not happen - this is causing more bad vibes and even more confusion.
Do we or do we not agree, We create our own reality - each and every one of us, so your thoughts own vibrational energy creates - YOU choose -On that day in October or whenever something will happpen - lots of things will happen all over this little blue dot in the Universe.

Do we want "problems from nuclear detonations" - What do we want - do we really know ?