|
![]() |
#1 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 3,380
|
![]()
http://www.examiner.com/x-2024-Denve...r-test-a-setup
The lie detector test "failed" by UFO contactee Stan Romanek was a "set-up", according to Brent Lussiks, a University of Colorado student majoring in business. Lussiks stated that he has informed Coast to Coast AM, which paid for the test, that the polygraph examiner bragged about his tactics to discredit Romanek, during a meeting at a coffee shop with the student. Romanek’s controversial “alien in the window video” was a primary focus of the questioning. A still photo from the video became a global news and Internet sensation on May 30, 2008 when the video was shown at a press conference in Denver, Colorado. The media event was organized by the EXTRA Campaign to create an Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission. The authenticity of the video and still photo have been hotly debated. The announcement by George Noory ,of Coast to Coast AM, that Romanek failed the lie detector test, was seen by some as a blow to Romanek's credibility. The controversy continued despite the common knowledge that such tests are unreliable and are not generally accepted as evidence in a court of law. In an e-mail to Coast to Coast AM, Lussicks said: “Coast to Coast -- My name is Brent, I go to school at CU Boulder Colorado. A few months back I listened to one of your shows about a guy named Stan Romanek, who you guys had take a lie detector test. Through a friend I was able to meet the person involved in administering the actual test to Stan at a coffee shop. Fascinated I started asking questions. After an hour or so of talking to this guy I realized it was a total setup. It was apparent that this guy is religious fanatic! The more we talked the more he revealed, Stan never had a chance from the beginning. This guy told me that he would repeat the same question over and over until he found a questionable response to use. He told me that he wouldn't let them film him just in case and that he had a 'moral obligation to stop the blasphemer', as he put it! He then told me it took him nine tries before he found one he could use against Stan. By the time I was finished talking to this nut I wanted to hit him, there is no justice in this world! I truly hope Coast to Coast had nothing to do with this I am contacting the Lie Detector Board to report this guy I am also going to see about putting this in the college newspaper. Either Coast to Coast is the perpetrator of this set up or you guys didn't know. Either way, someone needs to make this right! I am forwarding this email to others including Stan, if I can find his email address!” There is no indication that George Noory, of Coast to Coast AM, had any foreknowledge of the personal motivation of the test examiner who was allegedly intent on discrediting Stan Romanek. If claims of Lussicks prove true, it could thrust the Romanek story back into the spotlight of discussions about disclosure of UFOs and visitations to Earth by extraterrestrial intelligent beings. It would also justify suspicions that several people had about the polygraph test before and after it was conducted. The polygraph examiner, Glenn R. Knipscheer, knew prior to conducting the test, that Romanek had been previously diagnosed with three different health disorders. Any one of these disorders would have given an examiner justification to disqualify Romanek from taking the test, in accord with the code of ethics for polygraph examiners. Additionally, an audiotape of the polygraph session revealed that some of the questions asked of Romanek, had two-parts but only one “yes” or “no” answer was allowed. Knipscheer was a member of the Colorado Association of Polygraph Examiners at the time of the test. The discovery of Lussicks could also strengthen claims by UK hacker Gary McKinnon of finding UFO photos in NASA files, and further support the global demand for disclosure of such files from all governments. See related article on Stan Romanek: Why can’t alien abductees call a doctor? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 974
|
![]()
If lie detector tests were actually full proof ways to get the truth 100% then they would be used in ever case that goes to court rather than chat shows to test who has been sleeping around!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|