Go Back   Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) > Project Avalon Forum > Project Avalon > Health / Alternative Medicine

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-13-2008, 12:06 PM   #1
beegee
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 39
Default HIV Cure?

I'm surprised nobody posted this one:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081113/...ds_treatment_8

Seems like a bone marrow transplant may of cured one person. Funny thing is they say after all these years they've never tried it before because it's too expensive?! This was a quote by Dr Fauci. I'd bet they would do it if the patient paid 100% for the procedure and cash upfront!

I guess to some people money will always be more precious than life, even their own!
beegee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 12:16 PM   #2
Steve_A
Project Avalon Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northeastern Brazil
Posts: 1,259
Default Re: HIV Cure?

Hi beegee,

I think the public should realize that the pharmaceutical industry is BIG business.

Which is more expensive, a bone marrow transplant or a lifetime taking a 'cocktail' (just to make it sound chique) of drugs?

These companies do research and know how many illnesses are cured, but research sponsorship is rich pickings and exploiting the market to keep your own brand of drug sales up (and to cover the cost of private research) are what these commercial companies need to do, as they are commercial.

If governments nationalized pharmaceutical companies but payed the employees the same salaries, more remedies would be available as there would be no need to hide them to manipulate the market to keep profits up.

Best regards,

Steve


Quote:
Originally Posted by beegee View Post
I'm surprised nobody posted this one:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081113/...ds_treatment_8

Seems like a bone marrow transplant may of cured one person. Funny thing is they say after all these years they've never tried it before because it's too expensive?! This was a quote by Dr Fauci. I'd bet they would do it if the patient paid 100% for the procedure and cash upfront!

I guess to some people money will always be more precious than life, even their own!
Steve_A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 01:20 PM   #3
iainl140285
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 974
Default Re: HIV Cure?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve_A View Post
Hi beegee,


Which is more expensive, a bone marrow transplant or a lifetime taking a 'cocktail' (just to make it sound chique) of drugs?

These companies do research and know how many illnesses are cured, but research sponsorship is rich pickings and exploiting the market to keep your own brand of drug sales up (and to cover the cost of private research) are what these commercial companies need to do, as they are commercial.

If governments nationalized pharmaceutical companies but payed the employees the same salaries, more remedies would be available as there would be no need to hide them to manipulate the market to keep profits up.

Best regards,

Steve

Hi Steve,
This is very very sad but 100% correct.
The money isnt in the cure, its in the alieviation through the continual use of products.

How is such a gross practice allowed to go on - MONEY!

Perhaps this is why such scare tactics as 'bird flu' are used. Create the panic, supply the vaccine, make a mint! Disgusting


Peace
Iain
iainl140285 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 09:56 PM   #4
Reunite
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 279
Default Re: HIV Cure?

AIDS: The Great Con Trick HIV does NOT cause Aids. HIV does not cause anything. A staggering statement given the hype and acceptance by the scientific establishment and, through them, the public that the HIV virus is the only cause of Aids. HIV is a weak virus and does not dismantle the immune system. Nor is Aids passed on sexually. There are two main types of virus. Using the aeroplane analogy, you could call one of these virus strains a "pilot" virus. It can change the nature of a cell and steer it into disease. This usually happens very quickly after the virus takes hold. Then there is the "passenger" virus which lives off the cell, goes along for the ride, but never affects the cell to the extent that it causes disease.

HIV is a passenger virus!

So how on earth did it become the big bogy man virus of the world? The person who announced that HIV caused Aids was an American, Doctor Robert Gallo. He has since been accused of professional misconduct, his test has been exposed as fraudulent, and two of his laboratory executives have been convicted of criminal offences. Tens of millions of people are tested for HIV antibodies every year and Dr Gallo, who patented his "test", gets a royalty for every one. Luc Montagnier, Gallo's partner in the HIV-causes-Aids theory, has since admitted in 1989: "HIV is not capable of causing the destruction of the immune system which is seen in people with Aids". Nearly 500 scientists across the world agree with him. So does Dr Robert E Wilner, author of the book 'The Deadly Deception. The Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause Aids'.

Dr Wilner even injected himself with the HIV virus on a television chat show in Spain to support his claims. Other doctors and authors come to the same conclusions, among them Peter Duesberg PhD and John Yiamouyiannis PhD, in their book, 'Aids: The Good News Is That HIV Doesn't Cause It. The Bad News Is "Recreational Drugs" And Medical Treatments Like AZT Do'. That's a long title, but it sums up the situation. People are dying of Aids because of the treatments used to "treat" Aids! It works like this. Now it is accepted by the establishment and the people that HIV causes Aids, the system has built this myth into its whole diagnosis and "treatment". You go to the doctor and you are told your HIV test was positive(positive only for the HIV antibodies, by the way, they don't actually test for the virus itself). Because of the propaganda, many people already begin to die emotionally and mentally when they are told they are HIV positive. They have been conditioned to believe that death is inevitable.

The fear of death leads them to accept, often demand, the hyped-up "treatments" which are supposed to stop Aids occurring. (They don't.) The most famous is AZT, produced by the Wellcome organisation, owned, wait for it, by the Rockefellers, one of the key manipulating families in the New World Order.

AZT was developed as an anti-cancer drug to be used in chemotherapy, but it was found to be too toxic even for that! AZT's effect in the "treatment" of cancer was to kill cells - simple as that - not just to kill cancer cells , but to kill cells, cancerous and healthy. The question, and this is accepted even by the medical establishment, was: would AZT kill the cancer cells before it had killed so many healthy cells that it killed the body? This is the drug used to "treat" HIV. What is its effect?

It destroys the immune system, so CAUSING Aids. People are dying from the treatment, not the HIV.Aids is simply the breakdown of the immune system, for which there are endless causes, none of them passed on through sex. That's another con which has made a fortune for condom manufacturers and created enormous fear around the expression of our sexuality and the release and expansion of our creative force.

What has happened since the Great Aids Con is that now anyone who dies from a diminished immune system is said to have died of the all encompassing term, Aids. It is even built into the diagnosis. If you are HIV positive and you die of tuberculosis, pneumonia, or 25 other unrelated diseases now connected by the con men to "Aids", you are diagnosed as dying of Aids. If you are not HIV positive and you die of one of those diseases you are diagnosed as dying of that disease, not Aids. This manipulates the figures every day to indicate that only HIV positives die of Aids.

This is a lie.

Many people who die from Aids are not HIV positive and the reason that the figures for Aids deaths have not soared as predicted is that the overwhelming majority of people diagnosed HIV positive have never developed Aids. Why?

Because HIV has nothing whatsoever to do with Aids.

Anything that breaks down the immune system causes Aids and that includes so-called recreational drugs. The vast majority of Aids deaths in the United States involve homosexuals and this perpetuates the myth that it has something to do with sex. But homosexuals in the US are among the biggest users of drugs which genuine doctors have linked to Aids. Prostitutes who take drugs often get Aids, prostitutes who do not take drugs invariably do not get Aids. The rise in the Aids figures in the United States corresponds perfectly with the increase in the use of drugs - most of which are made available to people on the streets by elements within the US Government, including Bill Clinton and George Bush. In Africa, the breakdown of the immune system, now known as Aids, is caused by ill health - lack of good food, clean water and the general effects of poverty. Haemophiliacs do not die from HIV-infected blood, they die, as they did before the Aids scam, from a quirk in their own immune system. Their immune system locks into foreign proteins in the infused blood and on rare occasions it can become confused during this process and attack itself. Their immune system, in effect, commits suicide. HIV is irrelevant to that. Yet how many people today who have been diagnosed HIV positive are having their lives blighted by the fear that the symptoms of Aids will start any moment?

AZT is the killer. There is not a single case of AZT reversing the symptoms of Aids. How can it? It's causing them, for goodness sake. The Aids industry is now worth billions of pounds a year and makes an unimaginable fortune for the drug industry controlled by the Rockefellers and the rest of the Global Elite. For more detailed information, I strongly recommend, 'Aids: The Good News Is HIV Doesn't Cause It. The Bad News Is "Recreational Drugs" And Medical Treatments Like AZT Do' It is published by Health Action Press, 6439 Taggart Road, Delaware, Ohio, 43015.

David Icke
Reunite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 10:07 PM   #5
Reunite
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 279
Default Re: HIV Cure?

I also recommend reading this book on the truth about HIV and AIDS

Deadly Deception: the Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause AIDS
By Robert E Willner
Reunite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2008, 07:11 AM   #6
Ampgod
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 310
Default Re: HIV Cure?

Quote:
Originally Posted by beegee View Post
I'm surprised nobody posted this one:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081113/...ds_treatment_8

Seems like a bone marrow transplant may of cured one person. Funny thing is they say after all these years they've never tried it before because it's too expensive?! This was a quote by Dr Fauci. I'd bet they would do it if the patient paid 100% for the procedure and cash upfront!

I guess to some people money will always be more precious than life, even their own!
I don't believe a bone marrow transplant cured aids. Seems like BS to me.
There are non invasive ways to kill off pathogens etc.. See "Royal Raymond Rife".
Also see... MMS (Miracle Mineral Supplement) Documentation and DVD are very informative as to how to kill these types of things. NO Surgery necessary! It's a matter of cleaning the blood of pathogens, microbes, virus, fungus and bacteria. If you can target these things and kill them safely without harming your "good" stuff then you have the answer.

Last edited by Ampgod; 11-15-2008 at 08:03 AM.
Ampgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Project Avalon