02-21-2010, 07:33 PM
|
#1199
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 964
|
Re: Thuban Q&A: (warning longer than normal posts here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxasinas
Dear Trancoso!
I considered replying to your Dutch sentence indeed; but decided not to, because you did not translate for all readers unfamiliar with the Dutch tongue.
I did in no manner 'search' the web or forum to 'decipher' your enigmatic message, but simply engaged in other tasks.
I could say to you:
"Das monstroese Tier ist und ist nicht und doch ist, ist von den Sieben doch der Achte und geht in die Verderbung".
Would you bother replying to this?
Then I could say:
"The monstrous animal is not and yet is, is of the seven yet the eighth and goes into perdition."
I also could say:
"Het monsterachtige dier is niet en is nog, is van de zeven nog de achtste en gaat in ondergang".
Your original saying translates to:
"Ja, lekker dan, zo ken ik er nog wel een paar!"
"Ja gut dann, so kann ich es noch wissen wie im Paar!"
"Yes, well then, so I can know it as a pair!"
Your wisdoms and riddles belong to you and you are privvy to share them if you so desire.
I am not here, nor am I required to by my council, to PROVE anything to anything or anyone - are you?
AA
|
Abrax: NOT EVEN CLOSE!!!
|
|
|