Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxasinas
This is not the whole story eleni!
I have studied the wingmakers material thoroughly and it has been revised as stated by golfsierra.
For example I could figure out how a distance to the 'invading robots of 2011' had been changed to conform with scientific data.
What people seem to overlook is what the motive of the wingmakers material might be.
Here is my take. James wingmaker is indeed a 'high level' 'initiate' illuminati or otherwise. If this James is Mark Hempel (I think not) or uses the Mark Hempel information as a screen is relatively unimportant and inconsequential.
His scientific data about the universe and 'prime source' is magnificent and in concordance with all of my totally independent and unconnected 'discoveries' and insights.
So where and how did 'he' obtain this data?
He has imo total access to the collective database of the human histories as a 'high echelon' insider and from this 'he' constructed the storyline of the 'ancient arrow site', the Anderson-15 agenda etc. etc.
Basically, the Anderson-15 story is archetypical for a relative true mapping of the illuminati database onto this 'science fiction'.
So anyone having read the wingmaker material and having ben impressed by it, has NOT been deceived in terms of the information, but has been deceived as to the origin of the wingmakers.
So I would advice anyone to take the data seriously indeed with the caveat, that James wingmaker 'knows what he knows' because he has had or has access to the HIGHEST database of the PTB.
His motive for 'going public' is so similar to that of other 'whitehats' so called.
'They' know that the 'game is up' and that the 'change of the guard' cannot be avoided any longer especially at the 'emotion charged' 2012 timeline.
I'll elaborate on this if asked.
Abraxas
|
Okay, fair enough. When I first heard Jame's interview several years ago- he did remind me of an Illume- they way he speaks etc; That did *flip* me out a bit, and I got the impression he was residing in a *different place*. That's just what I picked up on- I could be completely wrong.