Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post - Did Einstein Plagarize His Greatest Achievement?

Destiny · 09-14-2008, 10:59 AM

The answer is simple, understabd GTR.

Oh well, here it goes.
Science (from the Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge" or "to know") is the effort to discover, and increase human [B]understanding of how the physical world works[/B. Thats from wiki
A new way of looking at the same thing is a new understanding. A new understanding can't be rediculous. And a scientific theory doesn't have to be useful.
Louis Essen, being a prominent scientist with an inferior understanding of science is surprising? Earth is still flat for some ppl.

Next part, E=Mc^2?

Take a look at http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608289 You'll have to read the paper.

At a crucial point in his reasoning, Einstein skips a line,
claiming: “It is clear that the difference H – E can differ from the kinetic energy K of the body with respect to the other system only by an additional constant C.”

Someone can't understand a derivation. O_o

We already know whats up with the Peer Reviews.

A theoritical proof is always considered more concrete than emperical speculation. So, the credit goes to Einstien.

Also, Einstien would have to be an Oracle to know that E=mc^2 would become that big to plagiarize it.

Einstien wins 2-0!

09-14-2008, 10:59 AM	#2
Destiny Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 33	Re: Did Einstein Plagarize His Greatest Achievement? The answer is simple, understabd GTR. Oh well, here it goes. Science (from the Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge" or "to know") is the effort to discover, and increase human [B]understanding of how the physical world works[/B. Thats from wiki A new way of looking at the same thing is a new understanding. A new understanding can't be rediculous. And a scientific theory doesn't have to be useful. Louis Essen, being a prominent scientist with an inferior understanding of science is surprising? Earth is still flat for some ppl. Next part, E=Mc^2? Take a look at http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608289 You'll have to read the paper. At a crucial point in his reasoning, Einstein skips a line, claiming: “It is clear that the difference H – E can differ from the kinetic energy K of the body with respect to the other system only by an additional constant C.” Someone can't understand a derivation. O_o We already know whats up with the Peer Reviews. A theoritical proof is always considered more concrete than emperical speculation. So, the credit goes to Einstien. Also, Einstien would have to be an Oracle to know that E=mc^2 would become that big to plagiarize it. Einstien wins 2-0!