911 ? Fugetaboutit!
1. The more evidence you provide, the better the perps like it.
The instant you talk 911 to the avg citizen, they get that 1000-mile stare, and fall asleep.
2. No politician will touch it because:
a) They already know it's an inside job, and want their kids to keep breathing.
b) They know there is nothing about the subject which will get them re-elected.
The "evidence" has been there since day 1:
UAL 175, still on the Flight Explorer screen approx 45min to 1 hr after
it supposedly went down. (Fligh Explorer's lag time is 30 min. max)
3. Gather up all your "evidence".... now, who do you take it to, who hasn't seen it already?
No one cares. Or... No one will risk their rice bowl over trying to get it seen.
4. The minimum time to assemble a valid court case, based on solid evidence is probably 10 years.
By then, everyone you are after will be dead. The government doesn't go in for self-flagellation over past events. If you don't believe me, then try this account of events during Sen. Kerry's POW/MIA hearings, when presented with hard evidence we had abandoned soldiers:
Quote:
By all accounts, what followed was contentious. The investigators and the team from DIA shouted at each other. Several senators shouted, too. John Kerry, the committee chairman, told one of the investigators that if the report ever leaked out, "you'll wish you'd never been born."
http://fredsitelive.com/reference/KerryPOW2.htm
|
If you want to give a good try, simply email the link for that piece of film to
everyone who "should care" and see how many answers you get.
Want to get the whole nation really
upset over this? Simple.
Have a press conference about it interrupt the regular broadcast of "Dancing With The Stars".
I am reminded of a line from a 1980-ish issue of High Times magasine:
"Who could tell? Who'd care if we could tell? And who would we tell if we could, or care to?"
Fred