Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxasinas
Dear truthwillsetufree!
[B]
How is the logic of the statement: Separation within Unity DIFFERENT from the implication of the statement: Unity within Separation?
AA
|
Ok this is most likely way too simplistic as one sounds like a statement while the latter is an implication. Maybe I need to make it simple to understand it
How this differs to me is there is no separation, or on one level there is, as we all strive to find our individuality on another level we are all relatively the same parts of one.
Unity within separation is only true within our physical bodies while we are still connected in consciousness.
Is this why we can THINK one way and FEEL the opposite at the same time?
Am I even in the ballpark here?