View Single Post
Old 02-15-2009, 10:48 AM   #250
taadev
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: America
Posts: 171
Question Re: Recent War in our Solar System By Norval & Gale

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dantheman62 View Post
... he might be right, or the scientists might be right....
If you re-read the link above Norvel stated he did speak to scientists and experts "across the board"; your post implied otherwise. (Fyi: Did you know lying via omission is the most widely used disinformation tactic? Yup, it's a known fact that while many ppl lie as readily as others eat, most do not like getting caught. Why leave in tact the ONE constitutional right in place, the suspension of which would allow zeroing in on ALL American terrorists/traitors? (The 5th Amendment and Brain Fingerprints.)

If one believes in ETs is this not a simple deductive reasoning problem?

IF one believes that ETs exist, one must also believe goodies and baddies exist. Is it then such a huge leap they'd have the ability to defend themselves to survive? Is it then also not likely they'd have skirmishes throughout the ages? (If not just take pot shots for practice, or who knows even fun, at some point in history.)

Perhaps Norval was not willing to deal with the team-trolling tactics used in these formums.


FWIW: Either a lot of ppl have gone to great time and expense to present evidence ETs exist or they do exist.
It's impossible to know for sure even if they present with bio-tech and hidden tech being what it is.
Mind control could explain the testimonies and simple Hollywood effects the rest.

Having said all that there is only ONE certainty in life, and I'm just playing devils advocate.

------ Unrelated to OP Truth or Lies? -----
Ppl unable to discern the difference are wasting their time reading or worse being misled; the media plays games that look a lot like those used a/g Norval all the time; it's the oldest trick in the book.

Ron Paul fans got a good lesson on layered meta-communications and media games such as team-trolling across corporate lines. (This time, perhaps, they were trolling for sheep, and the patience of a researcher as is quite common; I'm sure you've noticed. Be careful lest you, accidentally, appear like one of them.)

This, and most popular forums, present an exact duplicate model of the MSM; just minus the visual negative meta-communications. (eye-rolls, facial expressions of foolishness, verbal snickers, 'Oh please', 'don't tell me you believe blah...', etc. etc.)

One very easy method of detecting disinformation are ad-hominem attacks that avoid the issues/evidence and/or point to unnamed 'scientists' or 'scholars'.

In fact this is a good method of knowing when the opposing argument is likely to have merit,[/B] as evidence is used when it exists.
taadev is offline   Reply With Quote