Quote:
Originally Posted by Barron
I must admit that when i saw the Zeitgeist movie i totally agreed with the 2nd and
3rd parts of the movie - no disputing them when you do your research. But i did find the first part containing a lot of "new" info for me. I can see why this first part of the documentary causes a "stink" and causes people to doubt the movie etc.
The only think in the entire first part of the movie that i personally didn't like was when the commentator questioned whether Jesus ever lived at all! I believe he most certainly existed but of course the modern Bible account of him is rather distorted and incomplete and also full of mistruths but in my opinion there is no doubt at all that he did not die on the cross, and married Mary Magdalene and spent a lot of his latter life in the South of France.
All in all a good doco and if the first part stirs up people's religious beliefs then please just put that aside and learn from the 2nd and 3rd parts which are in my opinion, spot on.
|
What are you saying is what some bloodlines of illuminati say, they think they are descendants of king david and Jesus, because of that they promoted and publicited books like the one from dan brown who talks about it.
There are no record of such a thing like that by Jehoshua'ha Mechaich.
www.beforeus.com Seek for the compilatory book named "who's playing Jesus games?" from Jonathan Grey compiling all the Cientific research about the authenticity of the Bible, Jehoshua'ha Mechaich and similars.
Look my previous post on this thread heheheh.
The part 2 and 3 of zeitgeist are right.
Cheers!