Quote:
Originally Posted by swordsmith
Quackwatch is not a reputable site. It's some shoddy basement office of a couple of part time weeners employed to debunk. According to them mercury amalgam fillings are perfectly safe, lots of that sort of "valuable" insight can be found there. I can't believe people take them seriously, but some do.
I personally know nothing on the Peterson device, just saying...
|
I cannot speak to quackwatch's reputability. I linked to that site because it had a picture of the Interro. Perhaps you have the same opinion of Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center's evaluation of the Accupath 1000 and similar devices:
http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/69136.cfm
The following is the only article I found to positively mention this device. All others were negative:
http://coastherbal.com/newsdesk_info...4b35650d98ce3a...