Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Ryan
No, not too dangerous. I was just stressing that it was dangerous 
-------
Understood. It's a bit like the Free Energy question above. Having proof is dangerous, but we don't have any - so there are no decisions to make.
If we DID, thought, I promise you we would NOT sit on it and would definitely find a way to get it out there. |
As with many of the subjects covered by Project Camelot, bringing out
advanced Free Energy technology is equally daunting.
- Most people need to change their minds about its existence.
- It will not come from government, universities, or corporations.
- Much of what is public on the internet is confusing and marginalized.
So with a sincere intent and in the spirit of 'safety in numbers', I am asking for your help in, "finding a way to get it out there". Will you (Project Camelot) help?
Can you relate to these principles?
- To raise awareness of leading methods in energy technology, eliminating need for fuel or weather conditions,
- To enhance the quality of life for all of humanity and the planet’s fragile ecosystems,
- To produce this leading edge technology free of corporate profiteering, political control, or corruption,
- To distribute these New Technologies viably to the public, at affordable cost to all,
- To save substantial dollars, reducing “dirty” electricity, by adopting green power made right at home.
- To remain a grassroots, co-operative, public initiative, managed, funded, and maintained as such.
Thank you.