[Richard T]

It seems pretty obvious that people, when they truly realize the extent of a lie, demand answers. When people are lied to, regardless of the level of the lie, whether it is in private life or in public, it is with the intend of manipulating to the one's own apparent benefit. withholding information is another form of lie which has for intent domination.

But if doubt is brought about certain people, doubt must exist in relation with everything they may have said.

Can anyone explain to me why disclosure would be allowed by way of whistle blowers? Why it would not be an orchestrated and controlled movement?

Of course, any disclosure has to be examined with the highest degree of discernment.

And if there is corroboration between parties, even then, those points onto which they agree must be examined with particular attention.

I feel that reality when it hits will be much grander and possibly quite different than the leads given.