[qbeac]

Context and recent news:

Hi everybody, this is a clarification note about my previous posts (pag. 20. #478 and pag. 20. #494) regarding “real” versus “faked-Bluebeam” ET disclosure scenario (good ETs vs. dark ETs)”, because today I’ve just read two articles from two PC interviewees (David Wilcock and Benjamin Fulford) who seem to give contradictory info about Barack Obama.

So, one of them must not be correct.

I highly recommend their two articles, they are very interesting.

In summary:

Benjamin Fulford thinks Obama is just another puppet of the dark elite (or cabal).

David Wilcock thinks Obama is a good guy supported by a good faction named the “New Kremlin”.

Benjamin Fulford’s comments about Barack Obama
December 28, 2009
http://benjaminfulford.net/2009/12/2...b-250-billion/

Excerpt:

… First let us re-cap the New World Order moves towards a fascistic world government in 2009. It started with the inauguration of Barack Obama as president. At first everybody was hopeful but, it did not take long for the truth to sink in.

Obama was a Nazi puppet who broke all his important promises and refused to withdraw from Iraq, failed to close the Guantanamo torture camp and actually increased the amount of troops in Afghanistan. Later, he attempted to make himself de-facto world President by taking the post of head of the UN Security council, in direct violation of the US constitution. To bolster his position he was given the Nobel “peace” prize….

David Wilcock’s comments about Barack Obama
Dec-24-09
http://divinecosmos.com/index.php/st...ndgame?start=2

Excerpt (Pag. 3-5):

… As we have been saying all along -- both from our intuitive data and with credible insider testimony and research to back it up -- Obama did not fit this mold. He was never supposed to win the apparently 'rigged' 2008 election. Hillary -- Bill's wife -- was the 'selected' candidate.

As redundantly explained by the "Voice of the White House" source on TBRNews.org, the insiders were terrified because Obama was not blackmailable, despite what Skolnick said about most other presidential candidates here.

Thus, we have seen a variety of 'weird violence' directed against him and his circle, as expected -- but we'll get into that later on.

(…)

The insider propaganda machine of the Rockefeller / Rothschild military-industrial complex has done a fantastic job of channeling our collective Internet fear-porn addiction towards a single target: President Obama.

(…)

… Obama was never supposed to win – despite a highly impressive amount of propaganda that has now been released on the Internet to suggest otherwise.

The Illuminati / Rothschild faction wanted Hillary, and the New World Order / Rockefeller faction wanted McCain.

(…)

Say what you want, but once you have enough background to see that this world of insider occult politics is far from a unified system where everyone is on the same team, you can clearly see how the different factions took their sides in the last election.

Note from qbeac: David Wilcok’s article is very long, I recommend reading the whole thing, but I’ll just summarize several important points of what David says:

a) David says there are at least three main factions in the power structure of this world (pag. 3-5):

1.- The Rockefeller / New World Order / Neocon faction (which Beter calls the Rockefeller Cartel);

2.- The Rothschild / European Illuminati faction (which Beter calls the Bolshevik-Zionist axis, but identifies with the Rothschilds), and

3.- Faction Three (*1), or what I call the New International Coalition, whose roots are interconnected with what Beter calls the Christian "New Kremlin" faction in Russia.

(*1) Note from qbeac: Faction 3 are the “good guys”, according to David Wilcock

b) David says (or implies) that Barack Obama is a good guy supported by the “good guys”: Faction Three (New Kremlin).

c) David says (or implies) that Obama’s disclosure should be the “real” disclosure of positive ETs; also, that the norwegian lights were a sign from the good guys (New Kremlin) performed by sophisticated technology (HAARP or similar) to “remind” (or put pressure on) the dark elite that real disclosure should be done imminently by Obama… etc.

Questions to Bill and Kerry:

1) David Wilcock and Benjamin Fulford are both Project Camelot interviewees, but they seem to have contradictory opinions about Barack Obama…

… so, one of them must not be correct, so:

Would it be possible for you (PC) to interview them both (David and Benjamin… inviting also Alex Jones would be even better) at the same time (Ex: by Skype), so that you all can debate and try to clarify the “Obama mystery”?

For instance: Is Obama good, dark, a good double agent, a dark double agent? Is he being supported by good or dark factions? Will the Obama’s ET disclosure be the real one or a faked one (Bluebeam)? Is it really possible for a USA presidential candidate to be elected “unless” he receives the full support of the MSM? And that has been very much indeed the case with Obama, he’s been ALL OVER the MSM, he appears everywhere: TV, newspapers, magazines, etc. But we thought the dark elite controls just about all MSM, is that correct? So, what’s going on here? Perhaps the New Kremlin faction also controls a portion of MSM, or what…??? Something doesn’t add up... etc.

2) Same questions about the “Dr. Steven Greer mystery”.

3) Bill, please, if you have a chance, take a look at my previous questions regarding this topic in pag. 20. #478 and pag. 20. #494, and especially the possibility of having two different versions of Project Bluebeam, the “bad” version (invasion by bad ETs) and the “nice” version (bad ETs disguising themselves as good ETs, like in the TV series “V”).

Thanks. qbeac.