[Average Joe]

Yes but we need to accept that a significant proportion of the worlds population do have psychiatric problems. And a significant proportion therefore of internet users, and a significant proportion of users of any website including this one. Problems ranging from mild to severe.

It is unfortunate, but you can't be sure that you are talking to somebody of a sane and sound mind, we can't just assume that every person with a message is copus mentus. And thats the problem, you read all this info on the net, and some of it inevitably is from fantasists and paranoics. But there is no way of knowing who is who other than intuition. My intuition tells me that a high proportion of it is bogus. My intuition of course, could be ****.

So, channellers, people with guardians and all that? To be honest, looking at it from a medical POV, it looks like classic schizophrenia in a lot of instances. Unless of course there is no such thing as mental illness and the medical profession is wrong....all those people sectioned who are having delusions of talking to entities actually are....

But the thing is, they're not.

So why would channellers be any different? It would be different if there was just a shred of evidence that the things they channel are real, then you could say that hey, these people are the real deal, so and so said this and it actually happened....but it never does!

And if we had that shred of evidence, then we could say "she's been channelled disinfo" and put it forward as a possible theory. Until then though, her delusions were just wrong, not right.

Remote viewing, again do we have any solid evidence that it works. Yes we know the military took it seriously and researched it but what were the results?

One thing I do know is that there are no good remote viewers or channellers on this site as that thread the other day proved, when that guy asked people to identify what was in his hand, and nobody did.

God, I sound so skeptical. I never used to be, you know.