Hello Clark, I would like to respond to your post as somehow I seem compelled to do so. The astericks are your statements....my own statements follow yours with a dash.
*ill also add that alex said the beings he was in contact with view us as "genetic royalty"- was this wording from alex or was it an exact quote from the beings?
*if a being is advanced and "enlightened" im 100% they wouldnt view ANYTHING as royalty. and the ideas of war in space dont make sense either, look at our stage of development with nukes and now scalar tech,drones,bio-weapons, etc---- dont you think beings thousands,millions,billions years ahead of us technologically would be able to obliterate an enemy or a world in the blink of an eye?- We are all One but realize that "your" 100% is exactly that, "yours". As for beings that are technologically ahead of us, why would they want to obliterate an "enemy" as you state, your wording not mine because there is such a thing as free will to decide what choices we all make, and the thought that every species in space is exactly the same in their technological advances or thought processes is IMO not considering all aspects but a blanket statement on your part.
^i think we are projecting our own limited scope of understanding and quantifying things in ways we can understand- just like when they said god was an old man with a white beard
-are you not doing just that?
*quantum physics points to multi-dimensional existence- I agree with this statement
*TRUE contact is extreeeeemely rare- How would you personally "know" this to be fact?
*my opinion is that any contactee speaking to aliens from a "galactic federation" or "council of light" with a bunch of recycled egyptian names, who's message is to write books that .001% of the population reads, and that who's sole content is that we are destructive and that we shouldnt be is being manipulated - What would the percentage of population reading it have to do with its accuracy? How did you get your percentage data? Was it given to you from some other source or did you do a study and crunch the numbers yourself? IMO I would think that what the majority is reading would be more of the manipulations.
*its manipulation to turn ET's into a kind of messianic religion that teaches how to be in balance and not destroy the planet- Why are statements regarding being in balance and not to destroy the planet a manipulation? Is this not something that certain people feel themselves? Is this not a positive statement as opposed to the beginning of your own statement "it's manipulation"
*the idea of "oneness" and that everything is conscioussess(consciousness) and that we are all connected is something we are collectively starting to understand.- I agree with this portion of the statement.
*my advice is to use serious discernment- I agree
*your(you're) free to think that- that is the beauty of free will, everyone is free to choose their own path, however I must say that the tone in your statements seem to belittle those that choose a different path from yourself....just my own observation.
