Quote:
Originally Posted by Heretic
I have often wondered why a system based on control would hand us the internet in the first place unless it was being used as a monitoring device to create some "list" or other nefarious reasons...
|
I have contemplated the same question but I think the answer does become obvious.
The rich source of statistical and person information available to those who might wish to use it for the purpose of control, far out ways any negative impact on the planned NWO. To win a war you often plan to lose some battles, because in the strategy game one does not expect to progress without some loss. Also...
"H.G. Wells, who had so much to say about the Things to Come. There may be a long-term strategy involved in the computerization of the world and the creation of the Internet, which can be discerned by referencing Wells, in a speech before a Round Table front, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, in November, 1936, when he spoke of something called the "World Encyclopaedia." Wells said: "At first the realization of the ineffectiveness of our best thought and knowledge struck only a few people, like Mr. Maynard Keynes, for example... It is science and not men of science that we want to enlighten and animate our politics and rule the world... I want to suggest that something, a new social organization, a new institution—which for a time I shall call World Encyclopaedia... This World Encyclopaedia would be the mental background of every intelligent man in the world... Such an Encyclopaedia would play the role of an undogmatic Bible to World culture. It would do just what our scattered and disoriented intellectual organizations of today fall short of doing. It would hold the world together mentally... It would compel men to come to terms with one another... It is a super university I am thinking of, a World Brain; no less... Ultimately, if our dream is realized, it must exert a very great influence upon everyone who controls administrations, makes wars, directs mass behavior, feeds, moves, starves and kills populations... You see how such an Encyclopaedia organization could spread like a nervous network, a system of mental control about the globe, knitting all the intellectual workers of the world through a common interest and cooperating unity and a growing sense of their own dignity, informing without pressure or propaganda, directing without tyranny."
From "
The Encyclopedia of Mind Control (1998)" by Jim Keith
I believe we are in a state of transition and his vision is becoming a reality through the internet. Once people are taught how to think (the wrong way), what people think becomes far less of a problem because people will automatically filter out damaging information. Our schools, all through the western world have gratefully adopted the "how to think" method of control. This is why the flood of damaging/dangerous information is so easily lost.
I guess I may have lost some of you on this one but I think the point is a good one and I have given some time to studying this though I am no authority on it.
Consider the mind control techniques adopted by the CIA post WWII from Nazi Germany through project "paperclip". Consider the pressure to conform within the school system that takes on obvious and not so obvious forms. Were I to argue that Darwin got it wrong, how would I be treated? If I were to argue that the Big Bang theory has serious difficulties, would I pass my exams? Were I to argue that the right to bare arms is a basic human right, would I be treated well by my teachers and class mates? Were I to argue that to legislate anything on the basis of race is a denial of the oneness of humanity, how would I be treated?
For some places we would not be alienated by such questions or arguments, but the general rule seems clear to me. Many of you will know that these issues and many others to are not open for discussion or inspection in many educational institutions.
Oh well, enuff ranting from me.
Regards, nodrog.