Quote:
Originally Posted by TheChosen
DW as always provides an excellent overview and piecing together of multiple sources of information.
Honestly , very very few people impress me nowadays and provide me information that I haven't heard or read before at least 10 times. DW is currently one of them.. And I could count on the numbers of my one hand the rest such people in the whole world.
|
Agreed. I understand that many people don't like or particularly trust Wilcock. And of course its rather silly to suggest that a person like David or other researchers aren't in it for money reasons too.
In fact I'll go out on a limb and say theres nothing wrong with that, as long as that isn't one's main focus and their objectivity remains consistent.
So the question becomes, on most peoples' minds, is he deliberately disseminating careful disinformation? is he lying? is he a "disinfo agent"?
The most probable answer is No.
Clearly David is one of those researchers whose extra passionate about the things he talks about. He genuinely believes in his work, and it is reflected in his personality. Why else would he risk his reputation by saying disclosure is near and relaying specific dates?
Its because he is genuinely passionate and would actually risk letting that passion loose, even if it meant turning out wrong, obviously in a short period.
End rant.