I was hoping to finish this one tonight, but Robert talks VERY fast!! this bit is only actually
almost 20 minutes worth!!
and he was just about to explain the notary process...
Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception (Part 2)
Chapter 8: Hierarchy of Law (45:00)
RULES OF THE GAME
In Common Law the Hierarchy of Authority is:
Has to do with your body as a human being in a common law jurisdiction, rights and responsibilities… law & truth
GOD – Natural Law – all about Love
(whomever, or whatever created you)
Men and Women – Commercial Law – trading, barter, etc., deals with transactions between two parties, involves trust
(Human Beings on Land)
Servants & Merchants – common law – system, structure to afford many people commercial law
(including Gov’t officials)
Chattel Property
(Slaves & Corporate Entities)
… the other side is all about equity & fiction (line between represents the mirror trick)
Statutes, regulations, by-laws and orders
They don’t act on your body at all, they only act on your person, they only act in equity
People who exist in equity and act in equity cannot exit equity, grab something that’s existing only in law, drag it into it (equity) and then try affecting it
“Equity is a Bitch,” as they say, AND you can only enter into it voluntarily, no one can ever force you and that’s why their using applications, registrations and submissions and your signature. You voluntarily stepped into the equity game!
Chapter 9: Honour & Dishonour
Let’s bear in mind, we are all equal, if we are all equal, who has the right to make any demands upon you, who has the right to do anything, to command you, demand you, put orders on you, who has the power? No one…
EVERYTHING THEY DO IS AN OFFER!!!
It might appear to be a demand, they might label it an order, but then it’s an offer for you to accept that their offer is an order {{oh what a twisted game they play}}
If we are all equal, the only tool they can possibly have is an offer, they get you to break the law because of the way you deal with their offers, and it’s all about dishonour.
You can ignore, refuse, comply… or… utilize the fourth option that the government does not want you to know about… “the conditional acceptance”
Yes, I’ll comply but only if… and YOU create your own conditions…
Chapter 10: Conflict & Acceptance
The entire game is about conflict… can I get you in conflict?, if I can get you in conflict with your fellow man, one of you are in dishonour.
What they will do is to get you to deal with things that create conflict, and once you’re in that conflict… you’re going to be in that conflict in dishonour.
For example, a parking ticket… you’ve got 30 days to ‘offer ammends’ – to apologize, to find peace with your fellow man, if you do that, the court has nothing to say and if you don’t do that, because those 30 days went by and you made no offers, guess who’s in dishonour? And then it doesn’t matter what it’s all about, all the judge has to look at is “who is in dishonour”
In order to avoid conflict, what we are going to do, we accept everything, everything they want to offer, you accept… thank you, I love you… but with my conditions attached to it.
If you accept every offer they make, how can they take you to court? They can’t. If you’re accepting everything they offer, they have no reason to claim conflict.
Chapter 11: Notices
A notice is, in effect, an offer which you can’t refuse. If you do, you’ll go into dishonour.
But here’s a funny thing about a notice, a notice has to be understandable, it has to be clear, concise and understandable… and unequivocal.
If they hit you with a notice… you can discharge a notice by seeking clarification. “Yes, I got your notice, but I’m not sure what you mean by this word, what does this word mean? What does this word mean? What does this word mean? I’m happy to talk with you.” You discharge their notice, and what they want you to do is ignore it and go into dishonour.
Chapter 12: Parking Tickets
Parking tickets are just a notice… they at NOT a bill. They are giving you information, telling you there’s something you should pay attention to. What are we going to do? We’re going to accept it. We’re going to write a little letter telling them, “hey, I noticed your notice and here’s my notice noticing your notice and I hope you notice my notice noticing your notice, because now we’re in discussion. I accept your notice, I accept that there’s something there…”
“Now, what would a bank do? A bank isn’t going to go waste their time going to court fighting for $40, no, what do you do? You accept it, and then you become the administrator and you tell them look, I’m more than happy to pay you, you’re apparently claiming I owe you money, I’m the administrator here and I will settle this account as administrator. But first, I have to do a little verification, eh, I mean you don’t want me paying off a bill without actually seeing the bill? I have to verify this debt, so please send me a bill. Please send me a bill that’s going to have a signature on it. When you’re done sending me that, I want to see the contract, the lawful two-party contract supporting that bill. If you can’t show me that, stop asking me for money!”
If you do all that, what you will get is a Final Remittance, if you look on that… it will say remittance, they want you to send it in, say for $40… with your check… when was the last time you paid a bill and then someone said they want that bill back? You paid that bill so you can keep it… so you can say you paid it.
What’s a remittance? A form of money, sent by one merchant to another, either bill of exchange, a check, specie or otherwise.
They have sent you a piece of paper worth $40. They messed up because the word they put on it is “amount” not “value.” What you are going to do, is you’re going to take that little remittance
Both the check and the remittance are worth $40. The $40 dollar check does not cancel out the $40 remittance. The $40 check is what they’re charging you to do the administration on your remittance, they sign it on your behalf, they send it off and they’re getting paid twice.
{{I have heard of this elsewhere… it’s called “twinning the revenue stream”}}
All you have to do is take that remittance, put “value” across it… assign value to it, accept it for value, send it off to them, now it’s money, you valued it, you’ve treated it like a remittance, as a species of money, and you’re done!
We’ve been doing this, and we’ve even got them on tape acknowledging that you can do it, we’ve got a peace officer acknowledging that we’ve always got this option when dealing with these things.
If you look on the back of those parking tickets, they’ll tell you ‘payment instructions’ and ‘dispute instrutions’ – you can pay or you can dispute. If you choose the dispute route and you go in there, they’ll give you a piece of paper and it says right on it, date dispute was created, dispute created by ______, you created dispute, you never offered discussion, you never offered anything, you jumped right into the dispute and now you’re in dishonour. Whether or not you win in court doesn’t really matter, you’re in court in dishonour. All you had to do was accept what they give you, say I value that, there you go, take it back.
Now how can you do this, how can you just take a remittance and assign value to it?
Chapter 13: The BOND in your NAME
Birth certificate… on the back you will find a number, it’s a bond tracking number the government generated and floated a bond when you were registered as a child. This bond generates revenue every year. The Federal Minister of Finance is acting as your fiduciary agent, in trust, over your account.
When’s the last time you told him what to do with your money?? Never…
So his obligation then, is under the Financial Administration Act, his obligation is to transfer it to a registered representative, that’s your provincial representatives, they do this every year in the form of the federal transfer payments. Part of what their transferring, part of what your federal representatives are transferring to your provincial is money generated from your bond… and they have no right to touch that money whatsoever, IF their not acting as your representative.
You are going to tell them, look, you want payment for this ticket, that’s fine, go take it from this transfer payment before you transfer it…
You get paid, they get paid, you get discharged, there’s no dispute, there’s no conflict.
Chapter 14: Violation Tickets
Everything is registered and regulated.
A violation ticket is in fact a bill of exchange. It’s just like a check, almost, it’s an unconditional order in writing, addressed by one person to another, signed by the person giving it, requiring the person to whom it is addressed to pay upon a demand or at a fixed or determinable time a sum certain in money to or to the order of a third party or the bearer.
Sounds like a big complicated thing, it’s not… look at the bill of exchange
Every little element of that bill of exchange is found there…
They want to say, here’s your ticket, you sign the original, they keep the original, you get a copy… now pay up or go to court.
Under the Bills of Exchange Act, let’s suppose for a moment, you’re in a restaurant when a waitress comes and gives you a bill after you’ve eaten a meal… THAT is a bill of exchange… she signed it and presents it to you, she’s not getting paid herself, you’re going to pay upon demand a third party. It’s a bill of exchange… imagine if instead she said, no you can’t touch that… just sign the back of it and I’ll take it over to these bouncers because you refused to pay it… but they won’t let you have that bill… do you owe anything… NO!
No one can claim that you owe them anything unless they present you with a bill. This is what the government is doing with their violation tickets. Cop pulls you over, they offer you a chance to hold the bill and sign it… if you refuse to sign it, they’ll say Ok you’ve dishonoured it and they’ll sign the back of it ‘I offered you a chance to sign it’
Under the Bills of Exchange Act, if I present you with a bill, you sign it and give it back to me… you have just dishonoured a bill of exchange… you didn’t pay for it, you didn’t get a receipt, I created it, it was in your possession, I can prove that with your signature, now it’s back in my possession, you’re in dishonour! That was my bill you dishonoured…
What they want you to do is dishonour it by signing it. The way to deal with it is to label that instrument as a bill of exchange. Tell them I recognize that as a bill of exchange and I’m accepting your presentment. No argument, no nothing, go ahead, give it to me. I want the original. If they refuse to give you the original… and they will refuse to give you the original… because without that original in their possession, they have no reason to go to court. Without that in their possession, they’ve got no court.
If you offer to accept it and they refuse, they’ll say ‘what, you don’t want to sign it?’ ‘why should I dishonour your bill of exchange?’
‘I’m open to you presenting the original.’
If they fail to do that, they impose the blue copy, you take that blue copy to a notary public… bill was never duly presented, he’s claiming that he did, you have them stamp it “protest” for lack of presentment, you send that off to the third party, the Minister of Finance. They now have 3 days under the Bills and Exchange Act to either establish that it was, in fact, presented to you OR to re-present it. If they don’t do that in that period of time, guess who’s liable for the bill? The cop who endorsed it!
Just like the waitress in a restaurant who created a bill charged someone for lobster when they didn’t even have it. You put it in the system, you have to pay for it.
People who are doing this now, when they tell the police officers, yeah, that’s a bill of exchange and I’m accepting your offer and I want the original. Boom, they’re closing that book and they’re pulling out another book with warnings and they’re giving people all these warnings… well, I’ve already run your name through the computer, I’ve got to give you something, so I’m giving you a warning.
Peace
