Quote:
Originally Posted by Carol
Sadly, I've given up on the founders of Camelot/Avalon. Initially the information provided in Camelot was exciting and new. There is very little that they have brought forth this past year that is new to me now...
|
I think perhaps a shift in focus is needed with PC. So far, all that is presented are the STORIES of people as said to happened to them personally. Now indeed, many of the whistleblowers may be entirely genuine, and their stories factually correct. But still there is a sense that these events happened to other people. I think that everyone hopes for the personal experience; the personal vision.
In my view I think that Camelot should try to re-focus somewhat, in studying the physical science behind some of the claims of their whistleblowers/witnesses. What might be a good idea would be to allow people - maybe even from this forum - to write critical essays of the various video interviews of the whistleblowers/witnesses, examining their claims. And even have them posted onto the individual pages of each of the whistleblowers/witnesses. So that people could visit the pages, watch the videos, and also click on and review submitted critical essays evaluating the video evidence.
LP