Hi Kate,
I haven't seen the interview, but looking at the responses to it I feel I don't need to.
If Peterson says that all the information he gave is on the internet, guess where he got his information? Otherwise, how does he know all this information is available, if he didn't search for it?
I don't buy the "He knows more" and that he is only saying so much so that the PTB will leave him alone. Look, if he knows so much and has identified himself, surely the PTB would take him out before he spills any real beans. He's just let them know he's willing to do that and there's something fishy going on in his department.
I'm sure I'm not too different to many people, but over here where I live we drink mineral water from a 20 litre bottle on a drink stand. The tap water we use is for bathing and domestic chores.
Putting chlorine and fluoride in the water has been done since the 70's. This is nothing new.
So I ask, is it worth my while to sit through a charming old mans' interview?
Answers on a postcard.....
Best regards,
Steve
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kate
ok, I have now listened/watched all three parts.... overall i am left feeling frustrated.. 
I dont feel as though i have learnt anything major that most of us didnt already know.. it is clear that Peterson was very careful and cautious to only say what is already out on the net... he knows ALOT.. but cant say even if he wanted to....  
I am confused as to WHAT exactly was sooo controversial that it had to be given the ok by TBTB.. maybe he did say way too much initially that put everyone there in the firing line.. and those issues were clearly edited... BUT, in my opinion I think too much hype was given regarding the content of the interview....
however, saying that...I do feel it was one of PC's better interviews of recent times though... 
My frustration lies in the fact that clearly the 'off record info' was the nuts and bolts of what we wanted/needed to hear... Bill and Kerry know the bigger picture.. however i feel we still dont!  |