[tone3jaguar]

I am really surprised Tone 3Jaguar that you did not call Dan out as you have Greer, and while you're at it why not David Wilcox and his "channeled" Ra, do not have to dowse for readings on those, just listen to the material. David Wilcox also searches wide for material of other people that he presents on his site , that I may not have found on my own. Much of the material he presents of others does have some truth in it, or are interesting material to ponder. I just wish he would link back to where he found the material he is presenting instead of just showing some of the diagrams from others work, "His research" is studying and presenting that of others, correct me if I am wrong but he does not have a lab or observatory. Perhaps I did not dig enough on his site. If you have dowsed on his Ra stuff and come up with it as valid, then I will have to respectfully disagree wholeheartedly.

Well I think you have things a little confused, there is not much accuracy to these statements. I did not call out Greer, I called out Dan. I called out Dan only after he came back from the Camelot Conference and had re-released his conclusions that vaccines where safe after his "extensive" research. I don't want to beat a dead horse and repost the things I posted in the Calling out Dan Burisch Thread. If people want to know more about how I feel about it and why then they should read ALL of the posts I made in that thread.

I have never once heard David Wilcock (not Wilcox) at any time not give very accurate references to where he got his information from. He is very careful to make sure that he does this. I have listened to almost all of the science / consciousness material he has put out and not once has he ever failed to give the exact name and source for his information. You should listen to his Science of Peace CD and look more closely at his blog posts. He never takes credit for he work of others.

Eagles Disobey front page is like reading the National Enquirer, with it's gossip and innuendo. I am wondering if you have ever been to the site and read what is on there,.All of those pictures on there that do not mean a darn thing with all the baloney cloak and dagger stuff, do not forget your secret decoder ring out of the Trix are for kids box to further "decode" the site. As with all sites even Greer there are nuggets of truth in there, My views have changed dramatically and I am not as gullible as I was when first reading all of this material, nor have I ever been one of those followers of whatever dogma is trotting itself as "the truth".

I agree with this, if Dan Burisch is such an genious then why does his web site look like something out of the mid 90's? I am not computer wizard and I was able to put together a much more presentable web site than his armed with nothing more than time and a "Wordpress for Dummies" book.

I am grateful for all of the different points of view out there now, it just shows how from all of the supposed origins we have from all of the different "whistleblowers" that they are just like us nothing to hold up on a pedestal for they can not all be right so more are just as confused and believing disinformation and misinformation as anyone else. On thing to remember about most of the whistleblowers is they were all working for organizations which were not serving our best interests to begin with.

You are right, we should never hold anyone up as somehow being higher than others. I have said this many times and I guess I will go ahead and say it again. There are two categories of information when it comes to this stuff. Those two categories are what you need to know, and what is interesting to think about. The need to know category is much smaller than the interesting to think about category.