Re: Hacking the Genetic Mind
Hello Czymra, and anyone else interested.
This is the first time I have been back to this thread since my last post on February 22.
Abandoning the thread is a bit accusative, but I see how that would fit. I did say in my last post that I would be back later with some thoughts on Czymra's comments about the video and the "space between things".
What happened in my life, beginning in early January was that I was taken in an entirely different and unexpected direction, and every omen and sign told me that this new focus and direction were where I needed to put my energy and time. I am not one to shirk promises or obligations, but what happened was that I pretty much quit posting on the web, even on my own blog and website. The last post I made here in February was one of the last posts anywhere.
I'm not ready to start posting again yet either, but a friend who reads Avalon regularly let me know about the message today and I felt I should make an appearance and do a little explaining.
After my last post, the feeling I got was that I had done enough here, started enough and contributed enough, put out plenty of ideas including a suggested plot and script. I had nothing further to contribute that was valuable or original. For the time being anyway.
Some of you know that I am involved in agriculture. Part of what I have been doing these last months is chasing down obscure clues from the past having to do with nutrition, specifically the way the balance of elements in the soil that all of our food comes from affects the ability of organisms to achieve their full potential. It is becoming apparent that part of the problem is that those studying health have never known a healthy model to work from. This would be analogous to those studying mental health never having known an example of a sane person.
I am tempted to say that with the "right" balance of elements an organism would be able to reach its full genetic potential, but right now I'm having doubts about DNA being much more than a parasitic organism. Those doubts encompass the mitochondria as well. What if it is the DNA itself that was inserted into us as a means of control?
As a reference idea, I'll toss in the light body that is supposedly the template that the physical body is based on, and the ultraviolet spectrum body above that. Do either of those contain or have a need for DNA?
We are talking genetic mind here, and I started this thread with the idea of hacking that genetic mind, which implies DNA. Am I barking up the wrong tree? Should I instead be focused on bypassing the genetic mind completely?
What if DNA is the problem to begin with, not just messed-up DNA or its antenna function or the thoughts, images, and archetypes held by that DNA holding back human evolution?
Another aspect is that everything I have read about genetic/DNA research over the past ten years or so, including the sequencing of the human genome, indicates pretty strongly that the DNA structure and sequence does not explain the structure or function of the human body or brain. There simply is not enough, not nearly enough, information encoded in the DNA. I'm beginning to suspect that genetic research is a false hope and a dead end that explains the synthesis of some proteins and not a whole lot more. Why is most of it inactive and considered "junk"? Could it be that the junk DNA is the method of our imprisonment and limitation?
I don't like to use the word despair, but at present I am despairing of changing humanity through the method of waking people up or through any means we are presently aware of. I'm thinking it is going to take something from completely outside our known frames of reference. The Monty Python line "And now for something completely different" comes to mind.
What the "completely different" thing is I don't know but intuitively I'm feeling it is necessary, and I'm also feeling that it is rapidly approaching.
These thoughts about DNA, mineral elements, and models of health are the minor things that have been taking up my thoughts and my time. The major thing is more aligned with the new influence from outside any of our present frames of reference. As I said, I feel it approaching and getting close but it needs to get a little bit closer and start showing itself on this plane before I can even begin to say anything about it. At that point maybe I won't need to say anything, it will be obvious to all, or at least obvious to anyone paying attention and not fully determined to stay asleep.
Apologies for being vague, but that's all I can offer for the next little while. If I wrote what I was really thinking and more than halfway expecting I would appear crazy or a fool.
I do still think there is value in the idea of creating a video, but more for the sake of creating something beautiful and wondrous for its own sake. Czymra has noted the dearth of videos and motion pictures that have really had an effect on the mass consciousness. I would imagine that has a lot to do with the fact that from their inception moving pictures have been a vehicle of commercial exploitation. Fine art and decorative art did not have their origins in and were not immediately exploited for fame and money, same goes for the written word and for plays. Video and audio were forced into prostitution in their infancy.
What are their true potentials? I think we have barely even begun to see them.
The space between things is worth some contemplation and practice. One good exercise is to go out and look at the night sky and focus on the space between the stars. One can also pay attention to the space between plants in a natural landscape, or the space between grains of sand. Or even the space between letters and the background color of this browser page.
Apologies again for any who were expecting more from me on this thread. Right now I just don't have any more.
Love to you all.
|